So Gavin Rees in 80-1 to beat Broner

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gingeralbino
    WAR MAGEE!!!
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 7999
    • 224
    • 388
    • 20,405

    #21
    Originally posted by ROSS CALIFORNIA
    Yeah, I have no idea.
    the s isnt part of a swear word, if it was it would be a * too.

    i've figured it out, the word censored out rhymes with bigger, and with an s in front of it means laugh
    Last edited by gingeralbino; 02-05-2013, 10:48 AM.

    Comment

    • Box Up!
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2011
      • 1064
      • 132
      • 0
      • 1,480

      #22
      Originally posted by gingeralbino
      the s isnt part of a swear word, if it was it would be a * too.

      i've figured it out, the word censored out rhymes with bigger, and with an s in front of it means laugh
      The word is sn!gger, which whilst a perfectly innocent word, is, on reflection, dangerously close to a particularly offense racist word.

      Comment

      • yuppie
        Up and Coming Prospect
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2010
        • 1814
        • 107
        • 11
        • 8,409

        #23
        Originally posted by Box Up!
        The word is sn!gger, which whilst a perfectly innocent word, is, on reflection, dangerously close to a particularly offense racist word.
        [IMG]http://up-ship.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/******s.jpeg[/IMG]

        Comment

        • gingeralbino
          WAR MAGEE!!!
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 7999
          • 224
          • 388
          • 20,405

          #24
          Originally posted by Box Up!
          The word is sn!gger, which whilst a perfectly innocent word, is, on reflection, dangerously close to a particularly offense racist word.
          yeah i shoulda just wrote s****** instead of trying to describe the word it would've been easier!

          edit- that why i described it, i even put a 1 in it instead of an i ffs!

          Comment

          • shade darkar
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 6460
            • 227
            • 337
            • 12,996

            #25
            hahaha! 80-1? i think it should be more like 1000-1! dont see rees standing a chance to be honest

            Comment

            • Box Up!
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 1064
              • 132
              • 0
              • 1,480

              #26
              Originally posted by shade darkar
              hahaha! 80-1? i think it should be more like 1000-1! dont see rees standing a chance to be honest
              I’m old enough to remember people saying the same thing about Buster Douglas, more so, much more so in fact.

              People just laughed it off. What a joke, he’s got no chance.

              Never count your chickens, when you gonna learn? THIS IS BOXING.

              Comment

              • Bermuda
                potential friend
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2011
                • 5108
                • 240
                • 13
                • 11,493

                #27
                what's the point of this fight??? ring magazine really looks like **** right now having adrien broner at p4p#6 lol....

                Comment

                • RightStraight
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 331
                  • 13
                  • 3
                  • 6,454

                  #28
                  I don't like Broner too much but he should win this fight. From what I seen of Rees I'm not impressed or sure. I hope Broner fights Abril, that'd be interesting.

                  Comment

                  • RlCKY
                    Grade 10
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 5492
                    • 231
                    • 575
                    • 12,611

                    #29
                    Wow, Douglas was 42/1 i believe...so this guy is supposed to be twice the underdog?? But yet Rees is rated #5 or #6 at the division according to Ring Magazine?

                    Comment

                    • D-MiZe
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 25073
                      • 1,061
                      • 371
                      • 75,542

                      #30
                      Originally posted by RlCKY
                      Wow, Douglas was 42/1 i believe...so this guy is supposed to be twice the underdog?? But yet Rees is rated #5 or #6 at the division according to Ring Magazine?
                      Yet he hasn't proved himself above European level at lightweight. The huge underdog status is deserving, at least Douglas was proven at a certain level.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP