Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Marquez: I See No Point in Fighting Manny Pacquiao Again

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Not giving PAC a rematch is a B!tCh move, seriously PAC gave him a rematch multiple times. 5th times the charm, PAC ko's JMM then gets outclassed by Money. End of story.

    Comment


    • #82
      anyone who says lucky punch doesnt know boxing and is simply rump hurt over pacman getting ktfo. it was pacmans fault for committing the rookie mistake against a counter punch...plain and simple

      Comment


      • #83
        Let Mayweather have another tune-up before his big fight in May. Bring Marquez again. The pro-Mexican crowd here believes Marquez can KO Floyd.

        Comment


        • #84
          If a fifth fight is pointless (and maybe it is) then what do you call a second fight with Mayweather? I call it pointless.

          Comment


          • #85
            JMM just wants the money and I think he deserves it !

            IF anyone should get the 30 mill for the fight its JMM

            He needs to keep MEEEEEE MOOOOOO in camp , dats a definite !

            Dat man is in the chemistry and can do wonders.

            All the pictures of Pac getting KO'd by the Pac haters show the tremendous muscles put on JMM by MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

            JMM is game , he should have no fear, he knew he needed that punch, because he , himself said:

            "Pac was fixing to knock me out"

            MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

            wonder if Pac could hire MEMO to fight JMM ????? LMAO !!!!!!

            haters gonna hate,,,,,,,,,,,hate on

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by akScoundrel View Post
              The second fight wasnt controversial, pacquiao won. I scored the first fight a draw, but that aside if that one judge had correctly scored the round pac would have won it too. What was the reason for pac to give Marquez the third fight?

              The same reason(s) that pac gave marquez a third, and eventually fourth, fight should be the same reasons why marquez will give pac his due. If marquez is not simply angling for.more negotiation power....money.....then hes running. Just calling a spade a spade.

              Itd be another great fight and one of, if not thee biggest, paycheck Marquez could make. Why not make the fight?
              The second o mee d clearest victory of all for marquez and to me he also dominated the first,not just to me for a lot of people,,,,im tired of watching these two fight each other

              Comment


              • #87
                I made a thread about this. I'm glad JMM sees it the same way.

                Like I said there's no point to a 5th fight. Pacquiao got his mr. Myagi looking ass knocked out & that was that. Marquez didnt let it go to the judges & risk robbery like he did in the 3rd fight.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by K.Webster View Post
                  Basically, Marquez got his lucky win against Pacquaio now he's running. Give the man a chance at redemption. Pacquaio didn't have to give Marquez rematch after rematch yet he did.
                  I beg to differ. The three fights all ended in controversy with some saying that Marquez won and others saying Pac won. The third fight was definitely a judges gift to Pac. So with all that controversy Pac felt he had to fight a fourth time in order to win without controversy. But instead he got ktfo, so no controversy & no need for a fifth fight.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by akScoundrel View Post
                    Not sure what youre remembering, unless youre confusing the second fight with the third fight. Press row was pretty much split on who won. Pacquiao knocking marquez down and winning by said point is not controversial. Pacquiao winning by a point is a legitimate decision.

                    Controversial was the third fight, in which you are correct that the majority of press row had Marquez winning.
                    upon some searching, i see you are correct, press-row was more evenly divided than i perceived at the time (although i was correct in remembering that notable Filipino scribes had it for Marquez). but polarization is controversy itself. point being that Pacquiao did not garner a clear win and that the outcome of that fight was contested for almost four years until a second rematch happened.

                    not that i care for any consensus necessarily, but just to illustrate that the fight's outcome was indeed a subject of some controversy.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Cool story Marquez, go fight some euro bum.

                      I like how he gets one great victory and is back to fighting the same worthless opponents, because as soon as he fights someone like Bradley, Mayweather rematch, a top 147 or Pacquiao he will be exposed.

                      Yes he KTFO of Manny, but in that fight it was clear that Manny was the better fight, but was also to dumb fighter in that bout as he walked right into a well timed punch.

                      FWIW, I missed the days of real fighters and not these con artist fighters like Marquez. What happened to the Morales, Barrerra, Lennox Lewis, etc that would fight anyone and not make bull**** excuses or try to trick the public with selective match making? Boxing is going to **** and I'm starting to not want any part of it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP