Did Joe Calzaghe dominate the 43-year-old Bernard Hopkins?

[gmc_rfc_06]

Hopkins should have won.

Joe obviously threw a lot of punches, but I'm not one to score for a lot of ineffective arm punches. Hopkins landed the meaningful shots and that won the fight IMO.

[PinoyNation]

Yup, he did.

Do you think this was one of Joe's most dominant wins?

[Jack Napier]

hell no, he "won" on activity alone
not even effective activity, just the fact that he threw a lot
Hopkins shoulda known to step it up after the 2 Taylor decisions
but Calzaghe didn't really do a damn thing in that fight

[revs1227]

not dominate
but he won yeah

[daggum]

Inb4 daggum

damn ittttttttttttttttt. a calzaghe thread got to 3 pages without my input. it was a super razor close fight unless you count clean punches then it wasn't close at all.

[PinoyNation]

it was a super razor close fight unless you count clean punches then it wasn't close at all.

Do you feel that Joe landed the cleaner shots by a wide margin?

[Scarcaztic]

[daggum]

Do you feel that Joe landed the cleaner shots by a wide margin?

yes and on a completely unrelated note i'm also blind

[thuggery]

Calzaghe clearly won, Hopkins fans still bitter.

[CraigM]

was there and no he didnt dominate, he won and not by much at all


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android