for me Ring magazine lost its credibility.

**Bretty Poy32** · 02-01-2013, 02:13 AM

**NoLove** · 02-01-2013, 02:26 AM

I lost respect when they put Broner in p4p number 6.

Really?

Above Wladimir? Because he beat DeMarco.

**Check_hooks** · 02-01-2013, 02:30 AM

The Ring lost cred when they were bought by GBP

GBP whos founder lied about those pics being real and pathetically tried to cover it up

**lieutenant** · 02-01-2013, 02:37 AM

Damn Pacquiao fans are really butthurt that The Ring chose Marquez as fighter of the year

**maduming11** · 02-01-2013, 02:41 AM

Originally posted by Check_hooks

The Ring lost cred when they were bought by GBP

GBP whos founder lied about those pics being real and pathetically tried to cover it up

..we will rise again

**HughJass** · 02-01-2013, 02:41 AM

so what if he was fighter of the year,bradley got a gift decision whilst marquez knocked him the *** out,hell of a difference

**Pain~Lucy** · 02-01-2013, 02:42 AM

nope some of ring staff like satterfield and doug chose donaire as sure lock FOTY, i'm surprised too when pacquiao lost suddenly bronner become p4p even overtaking donaire LOL

**techliam** · 02-01-2013, 02:43 AM

Yea, the RING belt means **** now.

These are pretty decent rankings, check them out: http://www.tbrb.org/

Theres no P4P rankings, but we all know they don't mean anything anyway. At least divisional rankings have some objectivity to them.

**maduming11** · 02-01-2013, 02:44 AM

Originally posted by HUGH JASS

so what if he was fighter of the year,bradley got a gift decision whilst marquez knocked him the *** out,hell of a difference

..he does not deserve that award marquez just beat pacquaio who came from lost how could you be fighter of the year if you just beat a fighter who lost his recent fight common

for me Ring magazine lost its credibility.