So...What happened with Thomas Hauser having evidence that suggests Floyd is on PED's

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sapaw
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 1049
    • 34
    • 21
    • 7,537

    #21
    Originally posted by Pan-Africanist
    With Floyds testing agency being ****? Get your head out of your ass dude. That same **** agency is the one that brought Lance Armstrong down jackass. USADA picked up the investigation when no one else would. The FEDS had a two year investigation into Lance and ended up dropping it. USADA is as creditable as there is in the states. So your theory is USADA, who just barried Lance Armstrong an American icon, is some how in bed with Floyd the angry black man? Do you realize how ridiculous that **** sounds?

    There are plenty of shows like Real Sports on HBO and ESPNs Outside the Lines that are dedicated to bringing freelance writers stories national and nobodies touched this story. If this story had any legs, as they say in journalism, the national media would be all over this. If you wouldve of read the story youd know its mostly about Peterson and Morales. But nobodies gonna read that ****. So he name dropped Floyd and bam got a few million more hits. Brilliant journalism.
    You know the BIG difference? GBP/Floyd hired USADA but Armstrong did not hired USADA... see the BIG difference?

    Comment

    • radioraheem
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 5915
      • 165
      • 200
      • 12,234

      #22
      Originally posted by sapaw
      You know the BIG difference? GBP/Floyd hired USADA but Armstrong did not hired USADA... see the BIG difference?
      That is certainly a difference. But that article is laying the claim that USADA knowingly published false info saying that Floyd tested negative. That is a huge deal for an organization with their reputation. An organization that went to great lengths to bring down Lance Armstrong. It is just very unlikely they would lie for Floyd several times.

      Comment

      • sapaw
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 1049
        • 34
        • 21
        • 7,537

        #23
        Originally posted by radioraheem
        That is certainly a difference. But that article is laying the claim that USADA knowingly published false info saying that Floyd tested negative. That is a huge deal for an organization with their reputation. An organization that went to great lengths to bring down Lance Armstrong. It is just very unlikely they would lie for Floyd several times.
        and its because GBP/Floyd is their PAYING client while Armstrong is NOT. Actually, floyd case is weak on this one... the Morales-Garcia and Wright-Quillin is what really something here...

        Comment

        • The Big Dunn
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 69275
          • 9,488
          • 7,834
          • 287,568

          #24
          Originally posted by sapaw
          You know the BIG difference? GBP/Floyd hired USADA but Armstrong did not hired USADA... see the BIG difference?
          fair point. but if you watch the interview on 60 minutes sports its hard to believe this guy would sacrifice his credibility for a payment.

          Comment

          • Frank Ducketts
            Floyd's jizz
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 10021
            • 291
            • 67
            • 16,378

            #25
            So Floyd hired USADA so that he could cheat. Pac and Marquez shouldn't ever be suspected of using PEDS, and Chavez Jr just likes to get high. Broner lost to De Leon, and Shane was on roids against Dlh and Margarito, and Margarito never attempted to cheat. I gotcha.

            Comment

            • Outwest Exp 355
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2012
              • 9759
              • 1,183
              • 921
              • 47,595

              #26
              Originally posted by sapaw
              You know the BIG difference? GBP/Floyd hired USADA but Armstrong did not hired USADA... see the BIG difference?
              Thats weak and you know it.

              Comment

              • sapaw
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 1049
                • 34
                • 21
                • 7,537

                #27
                Originally posted by Pan-Africanist
                Thats weak and you know it.
                why switching from VADA to USADA when VADA is catching cheaters on their testing protocol and much cheaper than USADA... so whats the special closure deal with USADA?

                Comment

                • josenoway
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2005
                  • 2195
                  • 95
                  • 8
                  • 8,612

                  #28
                  Yeah, he hired a NON-PROFIT testing agency that's been in operation for more than a decade. Tell us how that limp d1ck conspiracy theory works again?

                  Comment

                  • sapaw
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 1049
                    • 34
                    • 21
                    • 7,537

                    #29
                    Originally posted by josenoway
                    Yeah, he hired a NON-PROFIT testing agency that's been in operation for more than a decade. Tell us how that limp d1ck conspiracy theory works again?
                    AGAIN, why switching from VADA to USADA when VADA is catching cheaters on their testing protocol and much cheaper than USADA... so whats the special closure deal with USADA?

                    Comment

                    • josenoway
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2005
                      • 2195
                      • 95
                      • 8
                      • 8,612

                      #30
                      Oh you meant USADA didn't bring down Lance Armstrong?

                      Originally posted by sapaw
                      AGAIN, why switching from VADA to USADA when VADA is catching cheaters on their testing protocol and much cheaper than USADA... so whats the special closure deal with USADA?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP