Trout vs. Vanes Amateurs

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dodgerjess
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Mar 2012
    • 55
    • 5
    • 0
    • 7,636

    #1

    Trout vs. Vanes Amateurs

    We all know Trout looked good against Cotto but he looked terrible against D. Rodriguez and Martyrosyan beat him 3 times in the amateurs. If Canelo beats Trout would that really make him the 154 lb. King.


    Last edited by dodgerjess; 01-26-2013, 03:27 PM. Reason: video not embedding
  • Mojita
    U.S. Marine
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 2489
    • 87
    • 26
    • 9,549

    #2
    Originally posted by dodgerjess
    We all know Trout looked good against Cotto but he looked terrible against D. Rodriguez and Martyrosyan beat him 3 times in the amateurs. If Canelo beats Trout would that really make him the 154 lb. King.


    Amateurs mean ****.

    Kelson Pinto and i believe another fighter Cotto faced in his 140 days beat Cotto in the AMs but he KOed them in Professional fights.

    Trout probably beats Vanes today .

    Comment

    • Larry the boss
      EDUCATED
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2011
      • 90798
      • 6,419
      • 4,473
      • 2,500,480

      #3
      Amateur fights mean jack **** when you turn pro...why people mention Amateur fights to try to prove **** in the pro world is beyond me

      Comment

      • Bushbaby
        Wild Apache
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 23513
        • 727
        • 370
        • 32,078

        #4
        Well, I've said repeatedly that i think Vanes has a good chance of beating Trout right now. I know Vanes sleeps ginger too.

        Comment

        • BafanaBafana
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2012
          • 1662
          • 53
          • 40
          • 7,860

          #5
          Originally posted by Ashy Larryx
          Amateur fights mean jack **** when you turn pro...why people mention Amateur fights to try to prove **** in the pro world is beyond me
          Taylor beat Pavlik three times in the amateurs, when they met in the pros Pavlik Ko'd him. Same thing happened to Cotto, who lost twice to Kelson Pinto in the amateurs, when they met in the pros Cotto KO'd him in 6 rounds. Pros and amateurs aren't the same thing.

          Comment

          • .:: JSFD26 ::.
            Brawski
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2012
            • 33329
            • 725
            • 432
            • 44,762

            #6
            Like I said in your other thread, it will make canelo one of the top guys. But what if Lara beats Vanes who beat Trout in the amateurs? I believe that makes Lara the king of the division.


            Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

            Comment

            • sicko
              The Truth Hurts
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2010
              • 34211
              • 2,594
              • 839
              • 151,307

              #7
              kinda reaching with this one don't you think...really you have to go way back to Amateurs?

              Trout worked hard and gotten better, his Balance is much better, coordination, everything compared to his Amateur Videos

              Only way to find out who is the best at 154 is for all of them to fight each other, it is no short cut to the Top and even if you do take one you will get exposes eventually and your Fall will be remembered far more then your reign at the top

              I like Trout Chances against anybody at 154 at the moment and that includes Mayweather (AT 154!)

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP