Whose losses have been more damaging to their careers..Pacquiao or Khan?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • El Gato Negro
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Jul 2012
    • 82
    • 1
    • 0
    • 6,144

    #21
    Khan obviously, Pacquiao is already an ATG

    Comment

    • Jack Napier
      Whores on Our Cul de Sac
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 8668
      • 812
      • 424
      • 16,030

      #22
      Khan by far
      Pac's an ATG and an old fighter at the end of his career
      he got KO'd by another ATG in a great fight
      that loss doesn't take anything off his historical standing
      Khan is in a career quandary if he loses again

      Comment

      • hugh grant
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 30638
        • 2,219
        • 940
        • 105,596

        #23
        Pac has been accused of good style match ups? But he was up against a so called really bad stlye match up against JMM, and someone as good as JMM to boot and was ahead on the cards making a mess of JMMs face and nearly stopping JMM, and this is supposed to be a real bad style match up, that Pac was not scared to take. Pac cant be criticised at all.

        He lost but he was going for the ko at all costs, a true champ.

        Comment

        • LeG00N
          All Time Great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2011
          • 20386
          • 1,081
          • 1,364
          • 25,738

          #24
          There's no real shame in losing to fighters of a certain level like.
          Pacquiao, Marquez, Roy Jones, Mayweather, Margarito etc They're elite greats

          but getting KO'd by Prescott is something to feel bad about

          Comment

          • Marvellous1
            Undisputed Champion
            • May 2010
            • 1265
            • 91
            • 0
            • 7,415

            #25
            As all agree, Pacquiao is already a legend and all time great, who lost to another one. Khan has been "upset" twice on the trot. Including another knockout loss. Khan will never achieve what Pacquiao has and the losses make harder for him to even get close. Khan hasn't proved himself better than his peers let alone the very best in the sport.

            Comment

            • Someone88
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2011
              • 3585
              • 104
              • 266
              • 21,125

              #26
              Originally posted by MANIAC310
              Khan..... he got stopped by Prescott and Garcia. 1 is a borderline bum and the other is a mediocre champ.

              Pacquiao got stopped by Marquez who is a HOF. Pacquiao himself doesn't have anything left to prove. He's a HOF and the greatest boxer of our time.
              Good points made.

              Comment

              • F!x
                It's In!
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2013
                • 2066
                • 124
                • 40
                • 38,324

                #27
                Originally posted by MANIAC310
                There's no real shame in losing to fighters of a certain level like.
                Pacquiao, Marquez, Roy Jones, Mayweather, Margarito etc They're elite greats

                but getting KO'd by Prescott is something to feel bad about
                Prescott had like a 90% KO ratio at the time and Khans new trainer told him to try and knockout Prescott in round 1. He should have told him to box him.

                On the other hand, Lopez has a 50% KO ratio and that's after knocking out your boy Ortiz, now thats really something to feel bad about.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP