Khan obviously, Pacquiao is already an ATG
Whose losses have been more damaging to their careers..Pacquiao or Khan?
Collapse
-
-
Khan by far
Pac's an ATG and an old fighter at the end of his career
he got KO'd by another ATG in a great fight
that loss doesn't take anything off his historical standing
Khan is in a career quandary if he loses againComment
-
Pac has been accused of good style match ups? But he was up against a so called really bad stlye match up against JMM, and someone as good as JMM to boot and was ahead on the cards making a mess of JMMs face and nearly stopping JMM, and this is supposed to be a real bad style match up, that Pac was not scared to take. Pac cant be criticised at all.
He lost but he was going for the ko at all costs, a true champ.Comment
-
As all agree, Pacquiao is already a legend and all time great, who lost to another one. Khan has been "upset" twice on the trot. Including another knockout loss. Khan will never achieve what Pacquiao has and the losses make harder for him to even get close. Khan hasn't proved himself better than his peers let alone the very best in the sport.Comment
-
Good points made.Comment
-
Prescott had like a 90% KO ratio at the time and Khans new trainer told him to try and knockout Prescott in round 1. He should have told him to box him.
On the other hand, Lopez has a 50% KO ratio and that's after knocking out your boy Ortiz, now thats really something to feel bad about.Comment
Comment