Uh Oh...Boxing Piracy Article

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bfg
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • May 2005
    • 316
    • 20
    • 2
    • 6,627

    #1

    Uh Oh...Boxing Piracy Article

    This was posted on another site...

    Pay-Per-View Piracy and The Internet

    By Thomas Hauser
    There was a time not long ago when boxing's pay-per-view industry was undermined by illegal "black boxes". Authorized cable boxes contain filters that impede the flow of unauthorized signals to a subscriber's home. Black boxes negate the filter. Thus, a subscriber could install a black box and, for the price of basic cable, illegally receive premium channels, pay-per-view events, and everything else that was available from the local cable company.

    At one point, it was estimated that as many as half of all viewers who watched pay-per-view fights on television did so with the aid of illegal black boxes. Satellite signals were also compromised but on a lesser scale because satellite companies scramble their signals and send consumers new software to descramble them every few months.

    The pay-per-view industry fought back on several fronts. First, it conducted a largely-ineffective advertising campaign with print and television ads that advised users of the black boxes that they were breaking the law. Next, it took legal action against the manufacturers and sellers of black boxes. But given the need to prove criminal intent, these efforts involved repeated warnings, time-consuming sting operations, and extensive legal costs.

    There were also technological undertakings such as the random inclusion in transmission signals of "silver bullets" that theoretically disabled boxes that were improperly receiving signals. One particularly creative industry foray involved a message that was filtered out by legal cable boxes but made its way through to fight fans who were watching on illegal boxes. Viewers were advised to call a toll-free number during the telecast to receive a free T-shirt. Anyone who called was presumed to have received the message via a stolen signal.

    Through it all, the lawbreakers remained one step ahead of the enforcers. Then, with the development of digital cable, the landscape changed. The integrity of digital signal delivery has remained largely in tact. To avoid piracy, many cable companies no longer even offer pay-per-view events to analog customers.

    Cable piracy is now under control. But a burgeoning threat to the economics of pay-per-view exists today in the form of Internet piracy. Within an hour of a fight ending, fans around the world can download a file and watch the fight for free. In some instances, entire pay-per-view cards can be viewed without charge in realtime. This practice is spreading rapidly. It's only a matter of time before it impacts significantly upon pay-per-view buys.

    Internet piracy transpires as follows. One person buys a pay-per-view fight, video-tapes it, and transfers the tape to digital format on his computer. Windows Movie Maker (which is designed to edit home movies) is one software program commonly used for this purpose. Alternatively, the person can plug his cable-TV line directly into an inexpensive piece of equipment that connects directly to his computer and converts the TV signal into a digital format that his computer can read. This is faster than video-taping the fight and then transferring it to the computer.
  • bfg
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • May 2005
    • 316
    • 20
    • 2
    • 6,627

    #2
    Next, the fight is "resampled" to a slightly lesser quality, which reduces the file size exponentially and makes uploading and downloading the file less time-consuming. The person then uploads the fight file to a server and posts a link to it. After that, viewers click on the link and download the file. The number of simultaneous downloads that are accommodated depends on bandwith and how the server is configured.

    Most PCs and Apple computers have built-in software that allows them to watch the downloaded files. If not, a viewer can search the Internet, easily find the software, and download it for free.

    In other words, for the cost of a high-speed Internet connection, fans can now get pay-per-view fights for free. If a viewer doesn't want to watch the fight on his computer monitor, he can burn a DVD and watch it on television.

    Many boxing websites and file-sharing networks have reader forums that offer direct links to URLs where viewers can download the fights. Some readers offer to send fight files directly to fellow forum members via messenging software. Here, it should be noted that SecondsOut.com considers this file sharing to be illegal and has a policy against allowing postings on its website that violate the copyright laws of any country. But many websites actively promote the postings and go so far as to "pin" references to downloadable fights in con****ious places. Also, if a potential viewer wants to watch a fight and can't find a link to it, he can make a request in a chat room and either the link will be forthcoming or the file will be emailed to him. Alternatively, he can use the search facility within a given forum or Google to find the desired URL.

    In some markets, this is the only way that fans can see a particular fight. For example, John Ruiz versus Nikolay Valuev was unavailable in the United States except through piracy. But more and more viewers are taking advantage of this piracy simply because they don't want to pay for fights.

    The new piracy is more attractive to consumers, technologically and psychologically, than the old black boxes. The boxes required a clear crossing of the line; buying a piece of equipment for illegal purposes and installing it. By contrast, for the viewer, Internet piracy simply involves logging on.

    To draw an analogy; suppose a rogue cable system announced that it was carrying HBO's pay-per-view telecast of Roy Jones versus Bernard Hopkins for free on one of its public access channels. Which boxing fan wouldn't tune in? How many people would say, "I don't want to watch the fight for free. I think I'll pay $49.95."

    At present, virtually every pay-per-view fight can be seen on the Internet within an hour of the final bell. Archival fights (including almost every fight ever shown on HBO, Showtime, and ESPN Classic) are also available. Most of the pirates are acting on a non-profit basis. It's people sharing files for free. In theory, it's no different than taping a fight that's on television and then lending the tape to a friend. But here, the fights are going to thousands of friends. And it's just a matter of time before pirates with a commercial agenda step in.

    Also, black boxes facilitate one theft at a time. Internet piracy is exponential. Some servers limit the number of times a file can be downloaded to a total of twenty times or twenty downloads per day. But other servers have no such limitation. And often, viewers who download a file proceed to upload it themselves to keep the chain going. If twenty people download a file and share it with twenty more people, that's four hundred viewers. Multiply by twenty again, and eight thousand people are watching for free.

    Moreover, the technology keeps advancing. Instant messaging software (such as Skype, Microsoft Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, and AOL Instant Messenger) now provides for file transfers. A device called Slingbox (sold in four thousand stores in the United States alone) allows consumers to stream video and audio in realtime from their own cable box or satellite television hook-up to computers with the appropriate software and broadband capacity (including laptops away from home). The assumption is that, by 2007, video conferencing will also allow for realtime transfers of pay-per-view fights.

    Meanwhile, corporate inertia is stalling a response. If the music industry had dealt with Napster earlier, it wouldn't have become as significant a problem as it did. But Napster got a foothold because of the perception that the music industry didn't care. Users downloaded thousands upon thousands of songs, shared them with strangers and friends, and soon there was a crisis. The same phenomenon is moving out of infancy now in the pay-per-view industry.

    How can the industry fight it? The answer involves a panoply of legal issues ranging from copyright law to the governance of cyberspace.

    Initially, the pay-per-view industry can be expected to make an effort to impede the flow of information that directs viewers to free fight files. Some websites and file-sharing networks go so far as to promote Internet piracy by referring people to a particular area of their site. It's likely that, in the near future, copyright holders will seek to shut down website forums that carry this information. First ********* issues in the United States and similar free-speech considerations in other countries will be involved. But as a practical matter, most United States and United Kingdom websites will capitulate and remove the offending material under threat of a lawsuit. Then, most likely, the industry will seek civil and criminal penalties and make an effort to seize offending servers. Advertising dollars will be used as a carrot and a stick.

    Technological steps will also be taken. Many file-sharing networks are now installing software to curtail music piracy and appease the music industry. The same will happen here.

    But whatever happens, it's clear that the implications reach far beyond boxing. Pay-per-view piracy will soon expand to feature films. In the United Kingdom, consumers already have access to 24-megabyte broadband that allows them to watch the equivalent of high-definition television with Dolby surround-sound in real time over the Internet. As bandwidth expands around the world, the problem will spiral out of control. Imagine King Kong (and every other movie) being available for download online and transferable to DVD for free the day it opens. The adverse impact on box office receipts, revenue from cable-TV movies-on-demand, and DVD sales will be enormous.

    Meanwhile, for the moment, boxing is on the front line. And the powers-that-be should take note. A person can sit at the edge of the ocean and pretend that the tide isn't coming in. But sooner or later, the tide comes in.

    Thomas Hauser can be reached by email at thauser@rcn.com

    Comment

    • masterdirector
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2005
      • 4957
      • 237
      • 376
      • 5,664

      #3
      fans shouldn't have to pay anyhow. Screw hauser for that. I used to like him until that article. wow, he's not for the fans at all.

      Comment

      • bfg
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • May 2005
        • 316
        • 20
        • 2
        • 6,627

        #4
        I still like Hauser but he really should consider the **** they try to pass off as PPV these days. It is not like they are only charging for great superfights and we are all just too cheap to add HBO...they charge for anything they think anyone will buy (Barrera-Fana???). Hauser should consider the other side of the coin. The same thing goes for movies. I don't download them because I would rather see them in the theatre but at $10 a pop these days how many people can afford to go to that many movies? So people download the ones they are less interested in. Big deal.

        Comment

        • THE REAL NINJA
          Undisputed Champ
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2005
          • 12376
          • 686
          • 1,093
          • 21,729

          #5
          all i want to know is if i go buy a tape of gerald mcclellan is he going to get that money ..hell with hbo and all them if the fighters not getting it

          Comment

          • Dirt E Gomez
            ***Stupendous***
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 9976
            • 952
            • 1,092
            • 18,863

            #6
            I would by numerous PPV's if they were 10-20, I'd pay to see any remotely important fight + undercard. 50 is hard for me to justify throwing it away on a fight that I'm not too interested in. Boxing's limelite will return with more exposure to the general public. ESPN televising larger fights with more advertisement, and HBO and Showtime having more main events outside of PPV's. I wouldn't hold my breath though.

            Comment

            • masterdirector
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2005
              • 4957
              • 237
              • 376
              • 5,664

              #7
              I can understand the movie industry being pissed. That is their source of revenue, the movie theatre, and rental stores, and retail stores.

              Sports aren't supposed to rely on PPV for revenue. And you know that jackass gets PPVs free. His employer almost definitely reimbursts him. If he isn't at the fights live for free.

              Fans can't go to live fights regularly. $1000 for a decent ticket? ****, who can afford live fights? And many fans already are paying for premium channels. And our cable providers won't let you get just HBO and Showtime. If you want both HBO & Showtime, you have to get all the premium channels. unless you have satellite.

              Comment

              • gattifan24
                King of Thunder
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Oct 2005
                • 931
                • 36
                • 1
                • 7,244

                #8
                If I want to watch Frank Bruno-Mike Tyson 2, there is no way I can rent or buy that in the store and HBO/Showtime don't really reair their catalog with any frequency so why shouldn't I download a random fight like that. I do understand them being upset about the fight being up an hour after the ppv. I'm sure they'd prefer it not be up until the free reair a week later.

                Comment

                • masterdirector
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 4957
                  • 237
                  • 376
                  • 5,664

                  #9
                  Originally posted by gattifan24
                  If I want to watch Frank Bruno-Mike Tyson 2, there is no way I can rent or buy that in the store and HBO/Showtime don't really reair their catalog with any frequency so why shouldn't I download a random fight like that. I do understand them being upset about the fight being up an hour after the ppv. I'm sure they'd prefer it not be up until the free reair a week later.
                  that re-air they call free is laughable. they only show the main event and it definitely isn't free. you still have to have that premium channel to see it.

                  the promoters and networks **** the boxing fans all year. screw them.

                  Comment

                  • STEELHEAD
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 14730
                    • 537
                    • 478
                    • 27,196

                    #10
                    i'm a complainer of overpriced ppv's. and cope with it by having friend burn dvd of fights and GIVE copie to friends who like counting punches and watch in slowmo. more satisfaction and offsets the price. don't see nothing wrong with it.and is legal.

                    the lewis/tyson and barrera/hamed never get old.
                    Last edited by STEELHEAD; 01-02-2006, 01:26 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP