More disastrous cherry pick? Pacman/Oscar or Pacman/Marquez.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bushbaby
    Wild Apache
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 23513
    • 727
    • 370
    • 32,078

    #1

    More disastrous cherry pick? Pacman/Oscar or Pacman/Marquez.

    So there I was putting in laps around Wapato as I battled the flu & this thought just popped into my head.

    Which cherrypick was more disastrous?? We know Oscar cherrypicked Pacman on a 2 weightclass jump & got force fed hard leather until he was forced to quit on his stool.

    Then we know that Pacman chose Marquez at 147 yet again in hopes of trashing him. He had the best training camp ever & was in top form. Yet 2 right hands ended years of his pfp run.

    So which caused the cherrypicker more??
    65
    Pacman/Oscar
    56.92%
    37
    Pacman/Marquez 4
    43.08%
    28
  • 10,000 Days
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Aug 2011
    • 79
    • 7
    • 12
    • 13,678

    #2
    That chicks ass looks like the tip of my ****.

    Comment

    • happyman
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Nov 2012
      • 681
      • 41
      • 81
      • 6,918

      #3
      Pac - Oscar was more disastrous imo.

      Pac - Marquez III was just a cherrypick gone wrong.

      Comment

      • Pudgemeister
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Nov 2004
        • 766
        • 60
        • 1
        • 895

        #4
        Originally posted by Bushbaby
        So there I was putting in laps around Wapato as I battled the flu & this thought just popped into my head.

        Which cherrypick was more disastrous?? We know Oscar cherrypicked Pacman on a 2 weightclass jump & got force fed hard leather until he was forced to quit on his stool.

        Then we know that Pacman chose Marquez at 147 yet again in hopes of trashing him. He had the best training camp ever & was in top form. Yet 2 right hands ended years of his pfp run.

        So which caused the cherrypicker more??
        NSB- where fighting the guy who gave you the most trouble in your entire career for the for the fourth time is a cherry pick.


        **** you.

        Comment

        • Bushbaby
          Wild Apache
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 23513
          • 727
          • 370
          • 32,078

          #5
          Originally posted by happyman
          Pac - Oscar was more disastrous imo.

          Pac - Marquez III was just a cherrypick gone wrong.
          I picked that 1 too. But only because I saw it live. I unfortunately waited 2 weeks after to see Pacman almost beheaded by Marquez.

          Comment

          • ElBossHogg™
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2012
            • 4940
            • 260
            • 197
            • 5,720

            #6
            oscar vs pac is funny cause dude thought he was gonna run this hype down and rematch floyd for another huge payday.

            Pac vs JMM @ 147 wasnt cherry picking, was just a dude saying you really want the match meet me at 147 im not moving down. Simple, he moved up and why jeopardize himself moving down again, he saw what happened to Oscar LOL.

            Comment

            • happyman
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Nov 2012
              • 681
              • 41
              • 81
              • 6,918

              #7
              Originally posted by Bushbaby
              I picked that 1 too. But only because I saw it live. I unfortunately waited 2 weeks after to see Pacman almost beheaded by Marquez.
              The fourth fight wasn't a cherrypick imo, both camps already knew from the 3rd fight (the actual cherrypick where they thought they could maul an old Marquez) that they are equal in terms of skill and commitment. And because of the nature of the 3rd fight where people felt it was close, others felt it was a robbery, people campaigned for a fourth.

              Comment

              • combatron
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Dec 2011
                • 312
                • 30
                • 0
                • 6,777

                #8
                great , picking the guy you had the most trouble with is now a cherry pick

                Comment

                • Bushbaby
                  Wild Apache
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 23513
                  • 727
                  • 370
                  • 32,078

                  #9
                  Originally posted by happyman
                  The fourth fight wasn't a cherrypick imo, both camps already knew from the 3rd fight (the actual cherrypick where they thought they could maul an old Marquez) that they are equal in terms of skill and commitment. And because of the nature of the 3rd fight where people felt it was close, others felt it was a robbery, people campaigned for a fourth.
                  Well put. All very fair points.

                  Comment

                  • Walt Liquor
                    the opposite of pure
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 21667
                    • 913
                    • 1,369
                    • 40,313

                    #10
                    Maybe jmm wasnt the best fight out there, but if you're gonna call that a cherrypick, you must hate 95% of all fights. Unless you consider every floyd/pac fight a cherrypick since 2009 (which is almost arguable).

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP