If both of these two retired today who would you remember as the greater boxer?
I've seen people call Froch a ATG and seen the majority of this forum agree that Martinez hasn't done enough to be called a ATG.
Personally, IMO neither are ATG's as i feel the tag 'ATG' get's thrown around too easily IMO and i wouldn't class either of them as All Time Greats.
What do you think? Would you class either as ATG's and who will you remember as the greater boxer out of the two?
By greater i just mean a combination of talent, achievements, resume.
I've seen people call Froch a ATG and seen the majority of this forum agree that Martinez hasn't done enough to be called a ATG.
Personally, IMO neither are ATG's as i feel the tag 'ATG' get's thrown around too easily IMO and i wouldn't class either of them as All Time Greats.
What do you think? Would you class either as ATG's and who will you remember as the greater boxer out of the two?
By greater i just mean a combination of talent, achievements, resume.
Comment