Margarito's resume is weak
Collapse
-
-
This is just brillant when Floyd fans here go on about how solid the Mosley win was they use the fact that he was coming off a win over a beast in Margarito but now they say Tony was a poor champ so Floyd fought a 39 year old who was inactive for a year and a half and in their estimations had not fought a good fighter in 3 years (Cotto) and this was a fight which he lost.Also no im not a "hater" off Floyd so don't bother with thatComment
-
Stop lying about Shane's age when Floyd fought him, and you are a hater of Floyd or you wouldn't have posted that sentence.This is just brillant when Floyd fans here go on about how solid the Mosley win was they use the fact that he was coming off a win over a beast in Margarito but now they say Tony was a poor champ so Floyd fought a 39 year old who was inactive for a year and a half and in their estimations had not fought a good fighter in 3 years (Cotto) and this was a fight which he lost.Also no im not a "hater" off Floyd so don't bother with thatComment
-
He did, you just missed the boat along with Arum.Comment
-
Looked it up and your right he was 38 still does not change the fact that if you guys consider Tony too be not that good then you have too go back too late 2007 for Mosleys last fight against a top notch fighter and while a good showing he still lost and yet the Floyd victory hinges on him destroying a beast only Margarito seems too be only a beast when it suits.Once again i am not i have huge respect for FloydComment
-
Berto is perceived the same way which is unfair also. Floyd beat Shane who ko'd Margarito. Can't change boxing history, and can't belittle Floyd for winning. Shane's age was not a factor, Floyd's defense was. Shane had enough power to ko Margarito and wobble Floyd.Looked it up and your right he was 38 still does not change the fact that if you guys consider Tony too be not that good then you have too go back too late 2007 for Mosleys last fight against a top notch fighter and while a good showing he still lost and yet the Floyd victory hinges on him destroying a beast only Margarito seems too be only a beast when it suits.Once again i am not i have huge respect for FloydComment
-
How am i changing history.In November off 07 Shane put off a good but losing effort against then under a year later he looked poor against a shot to **** Mayorga then in January off 09 he beat according too you and others a not that good and possibly weaponless fighter then after a year and a half at 38 (and yes age is a factor) he fights Floyd.Im not belittling anything but i always see Floyd fans having this as a good/very good win and this hinges on the assertion that Margarito was a very good prime welterweightBerto is perceived the same way which is unfair also. Floyd beat Shane who ko'd Margarito. Can't change boxing history, and can't belittle Floyd for winning. Shane's age was not a factor, Floyd's defense was. Shane had enough power to ko Margarito and wobble Floyd.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-



Comment