@Frank
1) You are correct. It's [you're] and not [your] in that context. The hours have gotten to me today I usually don't make that mistake. My professor would have strangled me for that one. I know better, I was just tired, trust me I know proper english contractions my friend.
2) You write "Second, why use this alt?" What in the freaking hell does that mean? I've tried figuring out what your saying but i'm lost.
3) Vitali destroys Ali. Period. What the contest is going to come down to is chin. Vitali has Ali in height and reach .... and dare I say it CHIN. Ali's chin is going to go before Vitali's.
**And PS, to anybody who thinks the Klitschko's don't dominate any era in boxing ... get your brain checked - It ain't functioning properly.
Oh yeah Frank, I agree mostly with your list, thats why I didn't post one. It was just ridiculous have Rios there .... a real rookie mistake there Frank. Shit happens sometimes. You obviously missed the Rios/Abril fight or you never would have Rios on your list. You obviously missed the Pacquiao/Bradley fight too by the looks of it since you have Bradley on your list.
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts
View Post
2) You write "Second, why use this alt?" What in the freaking hell does that mean? I've tried figuring out what your saying but i'm lost.
3) Vitali destroys Ali. Period. What the contest is going to come down to is chin. Vitali has Ali in height and reach .... and dare I say it CHIN. Ali's chin is going to go before Vitali's.
**And PS, to anybody who thinks the Klitschko's don't dominate any era in boxing ... get your brain checked - It ain't functioning properly.
Oh yeah Frank, I agree mostly with your list, thats why I didn't post one. It was just ridiculous have Rios there .... a real rookie mistake there Frank. Shit happens sometimes. You obviously missed the Rios/Abril fight or you never would have Rios on your list. You obviously missed the Pacquiao/Bradley fight too by the looks of it since you have Bradley on your list.
Comment