Comments Thread For: Bryant Jennings: Cunningham Definitely Beat Adamek

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Bryant Jennings: Cunningham Definitely Beat Adamek

    BETHLEHEM, Pa. — Bryant Jennings had just about as good a ringside seat as the three judges Saturday.

    From right near the ring apron, seated beside promoter Kathy Duva, Jennings saw something completely different than two of them. Jennings left Sands Casino Resort’s Events Center confused as to how fellow Philadelphia heavyweight Steve Cunningham (25-5, 12 KOs) didn’t receive credit for out-boxing Tomasz Adamek (48-2, 29 KOs) in their nationally televised rematch.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • MrClutch85
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 4081
    • 81
    • 0
    • 15,236

    #2
    Cunningham Adamek 3 needs to happen asap he clearly won the fight

    Comment

    • cam89
      Banned
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Dec 2012
      • 28
      • 6
      • 0
      • 95

      #3
      cunningham was clearly better at landing his weak jab and running the whole fight . of course blacks back other blacks why do you think 99% voted for *****

      Comment

      • theboxingguru
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Nov 2012
        • 171
        • 5
        • 0
        • 6,207

        #4
        Originally posted by cam89
        cunningham was clearly better at landing his weak jab and running the whole fight . of course blacks back other blacks why do you think 99% voted for *****
        You're a complete idiot. You and people like you are the reason our country is in the mess it's in now. Furthermore, if you were a true boxing fan skin color would have nothing to do with your commentary

        Comment

        • g-wane
          Contender
          • Dec 2012
          • 328
          • 16
          • 0
          • 6,400

          #5
          Originally posted by cam89
          cunningham was clearly better at landing his weak jab and running the whole fight . of course blacks back other blacks why do you think 99% voted for *****
          Let me correct you on your backward ass redneck 1920 thinking .. For one Artur Szpilka also though Admek lost which he did, which had nothing to do with his color .. Admek extra 20lb of fat hindered him from doing anything but backing up taking jabs and right hands . He was too heavy and slow to close the distance on the much quicker Cunningham. Nor did he have the power to even hurt Cunningham.


          Which brings the issue back to you. ***** won because Mitt Romney is a lying blind hick like yourself.. Who failed to see that he insulted the 47% working poor which included black, hispanic, philipino , women and other non-white and whites..
          You're an idiot pure and simple.

          Comment

          • ShoulderRoll
            Join The Great Resist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 55950
            • 10,031
            • 5,022
            • 763,445

            #6
            Most boxing people saw Cunningham as the winner. Horrid decision.

            Comment

            • No Bias
              Amateur
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Dec 2010
              • 4
              • 0
              • 0
              • 6,032

              #7
              My scorecard looked like Freddie Roach's thru 10 rounds...even. And Adamek pulled out the last 2 rounds. Not a robbery. Good decision for a close fight, in which neither fighter shined.

              Comment

              • Hamaru
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Jun 2011
                • 152
                • 7
                • 4
                • 6,209

                #8
                Originally posted by cam89
                cunningham was clearly better at landing his weak jab and running the whole fight . of course blacks back other blacks why do you think 99% voted for *****
                You sound more like a racist than a boxing fan. Non-black people thought Cunningham won the fight as well. As for *****, he was simply a better choice. Romney flip flopped more than John Kerry, avoids paying taxes, lies consistently, and wanted to carry on a failed tax cut plan that didn't work under Bush and would only make things worse now.

                Comment

                • royjonesjrKTFO
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 1125
                  • 32
                  • 1
                  • 12,803

                  #9
                  A ONE POINT or two point fight is not a robbery, people. I scored it 7-5 in rds to Adamek or a draw since there were several close rounds. When there is alot of close rounds, you're the champion being the aggressor, close rounds usually goes to that fighter. Cunningham didn't do enough to TAKE the title away. He did alot of running in this rematch than the 1st meeting between the two. Running around w/ a high guard w/ the Champion chasing you down. Literally chased around the corners of the ring without throwing anything to keep him off sometimes.

                  Comment

                  • White_Knight
                    At a lady's service
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 2626
                    • 213
                    • 474
                    • 9,122

                    #10
                    It was a close fight. My overall impression was that Cunningham edged it, but there wasn't much in it.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP