Originally posted by Capaedia
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Steve Cunningham in Tears Over Loss: I Was Cheated!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Freedom. View PostI've seen around the websites that most Americans (including those in the media) had Cunningham winning, while most Polish viewers had Adamek winning.
I'm neither American like Cunningham, nor Polish like Adamek. I saw a very close fight.
I thought Adamek won 115-113 (despite some pretty footwork and jabs from Cunningham) because he landed the cleaner, harder power punches and he took the fight to Cunningham who ran too much.
But there is no point in arguing. The only way Adamek would be given credit is if he KOed Cunningham, and even then you'd just say Cunningham was no good anyway (same way you discredit the Klitschkos by saying their opponents were no good).
Comment
-
As long as fans saw the fight, and saw who won, that's all that counts. Still the fighter has to go through the hurt. Anyone who had Adamek winning 7-5 or more, hmu. No red k given. I'll just put you on ignore when fights are close so that I don't have to read your bias. Nobody had Adamek winning except the judges. Adamek better thank his fan base because even he thought he lost.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Freedom. View PostI've seen around the websites that most Americans (including those in the media) had Cunningham winning, while most Polish viewers had Adamek winning.
I'm neither American like Cunningham, nor Polish like Adamek. I saw a very close fight.
I thought Adamek won 115-113 (despite some pretty footwork and jabs from Cunningham) because he landed the cleaner, harder power punches and he took the fight to Cunningham who ran too much.
But there is no point in arguing. The only way Adamek would be given credit is if he KOed Cunningham, and even then you'd just say Cunningham was no good anyway (same way you discredit the Klitschkos by saying their opponents were no good).
Nobody is out to get the K-Bros (at least not me) but that still doesn't change Tko 6.... It happened it burns I know.... But let it go
Comment
-
why was Cunningham whining after the fight when he was running and hugging during the actual fight?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Freedom. View PostI've seen around the websites that most Americans (including those in the media) had Cunningham winning, while most Polish viewers had Adamek winning.
I'm neither American like Cunningham, nor Polish like Adamek. I saw a very close fight.
I thought Adamek won 115-113 (despite some pretty footwork and jabs from Cunningham) because he landed the cleaner, harder power punches and he took the fight to Cunningham who ran too much.
But there is no point in arguing. The only way Adamek would be given credit is if he KOed Cunningham, and even then you'd just say Cunningham was no good anyway (same way you discredit the Klitschkos by saying their opponents were no good).
You had Adamek winning 7-5. Hilarious!Last edited by Frank Ducketts; 12-22-2012, 09:34 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostNeither Klitschsko fought tonight mother****er. I'm glad you had Adamek winning. You had half a % respect from biased fans like yourself, and now you have zero respect. You had Adamek winning 7 rounds, and you say Steve ran too much? Remember this, and remember this well since you like to bring up the K brothers you phony bastard lol. Lennox and Byrd own Vitali, and Purrity, Brewster, Williamson, and Sanders R.I.P own your heroes. Fake ass, lmao!
you had Adamek winning 7-5. Hilarious!
Comment
Comment