Comments Thread For: Steve Cunningham in Tears Over Loss: I Was Cheated!

[Hougigo]

A scorecard change....really?
If you're going to cheat and rob the man, at least don't do it on NBC when people are watching for free..... come on now.

[crold1]

A scorecard change....really?
If you're going to cheat and rob the man, at least don't do it on NBC when people are watching for free..... come on now.

There was no change. Buffer read it wrong. The official scorecard was mis-added to 115-112. It was 115-113

[Hougigo]

Watch it go to four fights and Cunningham gets justice Marquez style

[The Hammer]

Not mad at the red k..... But I along with several other posters here had the same score of 9-3 including Cliff Rold..... Did you red k him as well???

Another suggestion.... Check twitter and see if you see more scores resembling mine or yours

If Fightscore collects scorecards for this bout I will link you there as well.

I've seen around the websites that most Americans (including those in the media) had Cunningham winning, while most Polish viewers had Adamek winning.

I'm neither American like Cunningham, nor Polish like Adamek. I saw a very close fight.

I thought Adamek won 115-113 (despite some pretty footwork and jabs from Cunningham) because he landed the cleaner, harder power punches and he took the fight to Cunningham who ran too much.

But there is no point in arguing. The only way Adamek would be given credit is if he KOed Cunningham, and even then you'd just say Cunningham was no good anyway (same way you discredit the Klitschkos by saying their opponents were no good).

[Hougigo]

There was no change. Buffer read it wrong. The official scorecard was mis-added to 115-112. It was 115-113

My mistake, but still a dismal showing on NBC.
Can't wait for everybody to hate boxing even more

[crold1]

I've seen around the websites that most Americans (including those in the media) had Cunningham winning, while most Polish viewers had Adamek winning.

I'm neither American like Cunningham, nor Polish like Adamek. I saw a very close fight.

I thought Adamek won 115-113 (despite some pretty footwork and jabs from Cunningham) because he landed the cleaner, harder power punches and he took the fight to Cunningham who ran too much.

But there is no point in arguing. The only way Adamek would be given credit is if he KOed Cunningham, and even then you'd just say Cunningham was no good anyway (same way you discredit the Klitschkos by saying their opponents were no good).

The difference is that Adamek has a RABID national (and ethnic) fan base. Cunningham doesn't. The more jaundiced eye in this case would be the Adamek base.

[Rajon34]

Good thing NBC should the post-fight interviews

[Cutthroat]

Not mad at the red k..... But I along with several other posters here had the same score of 9-3 including Cliff Rold..... Did you red k him as well???

Another suggestion.... Check twitter and see if you see more scores resembling mine or yours

If Fightscore collects scorecards for this bout I will link you there as well

Freedom thought the white Euro beat the black American? Unbelievable.

[!! Shawn]

Almost no one anywhere has Adamek winning. They sure as hell don't come up with 116-112. I like Adamek and picked him to win, but this was silly. 9-3 was fair. 8-4 could have been.

For Cunningham.

I agree. You don't win fights by plodding around and blocking punches with your face.

[Cutthroat]

Not mad at the red k..... But I along with several other posters here had the same score of 9-3 including Cliff Rold..... Did you red k him as well???

Another suggestion.... Check twitter and see if you see more scores resembling mine or yours

If Fightscore collects scorecards for this bout I will link you there as well

Freedom thought the white Euro beat the black American? Unbelievable.


Anyways I didn't see the full fight, just the last 6 rounds in which I had Cunningham up 4-2.