Thank you for noticing my career and writing to me. I thought Eu banks was a good fighter but not a great fighter by any means, He was kind of awkward and slippery with some good punching abilities but had zero classical boxing abilities. Eu banks may of been a great fighter in Europe of wherever but he was not a great fighter here in the States. He was more of a showman than a boxer, and the WBO needed him for them to stay on the radar and so they gave him star treatment which include gift decisions. I, as did many others including the reporters thought I won that fight with him. I can remember one of the judges being asked how he could score the 12th round of the fight for Eu banks when he actually turned his back at one point and ran. The judge responded by saying that was good defense. I had always heard about those kinds of decisions happening on foreign soil, but then I experienced it first hand. Having fought both of those guys back to back, I don't think Chris had enough workrate to beat James, James had better punch output and better technical punching abilities and even though James wasn't known for his consistency from fight to fight he was more consistent than Eu banks throughout a fight, and a much more reliable defense. Thanks.
Tony
Tony
Comment