Comments Thread For: Froch-Kessler Rematch Close, $2 Million Going To Both

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nÔÔb_out_king
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 256
    • 39
    • 85
    • 6,468

    #41
    Originally posted by Andrew5550
    True, but I don't think they are way different in levels at the moment. At least Kessler KO'd him violently. But you're right, Froch edges it in competition of course. But the way Kessler has looked I genuinly put this down as 50/50 which is why the matchup is so exciting. But I don't see this being a KO - both have great chins, probably Froch has the better. But then again, Kessler probably has more power. If he can somehow turn it back a few years, I see him winning a UD.
    I agree that Froch edges Kessler in competition (since their fight), but Kessler had his eye injury in the fight with Froch and in the fight with Froch he was coming of a (at that time) very surprising loss to Ward. Besides - present day - Kessler only needed 7 minutes to KO Magee (that was better now then when he fought Froch and Bute - at least he said so himself) then Froch, who needed 11 rounds to KO him, (and was even behind when he did).

    I realize that you can't compare it like I've done above, but I still think that Kessler is a 60-40 favourite. (Maybe 55-45 considering Frochs home field advantage).

    Comment

    • BattlingNelson
      Mod a Phukka
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 29840
      • 3,246
      • 3,191
      • 286,536

      #42
      Froch has done a great job by repeating over and over that the first fight would have been a win for him had it been in the UK.

      If that had been a win for froch, it would have been robbery of the decade. Kessler clearly won. Almost all of the posters on boxingscene had him as winner. Same for the british media. Punchstat numbers was also clearly in favour of the dane.

      Too many people drinking the Froch cool-aid.

      Comment

      • LacedUp
        Still Smokin'
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 29171
        • 781
        • 381
        • 132,163

        #43
        Originally posted by BattlingNelson
        Froch has done a great job by repeating over and over that the first fight would have been a win for him had it been in the UK.

        If that had been a win for froch, it would have been robbery of the decade. Kessler clearly won. Almost all of the posters on boxingscene had him as winner. Same for the british media. Punchstat numbers was also clearly in favour of the dane.

        Too many people drinking the Froch cool-aid.

        True. I mean I love Froch - but everyone should take their defeats like a man. This is the only thing that slightly bugs me about Froch - he's complaining. Also he says his UD loss to Froch was a really really close decision. It wasn't. It was clear as day. Kessler's was a lot tighter of course, but I heard some experts having it 8-4 Kessler. Kessler was just busier throughout and IMO edged it. If he goes back to the Calzaghe days and keeps behind his strong left jab and good movement he should have this. I think Kessler got too much into a tear up compared to what he should have. But it's hard not to of course.

        Comment

        • LacedUp
          Still Smokin'
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 29171
          • 781
          • 381
          • 132,163

          #44
          Originally posted by nÔÔb_out_king
          I agree that Froch edges Kessler in competition (since their fight), but Kessler had his eye injury in the fight with Froch and in the fight with Froch he was coming of a (at that time) very surprising loss to Ward. Besides - present day - Kessler only needed 7 minutes to KO Magee (that was better now then when he fought Froch and Bute - at least he said so himself) then Froch, who needed 11 rounds to KO him, (and was even behind when he did).

          I realize that you can't compare it like I've done above, but I still think that Kessler is a 60-40 favourite. (Maybe 55-45 considering Frochs home field advantage).
          I mean I agree. I think Kessler will win again, but let's see. He's certainly the all round better fighter - I don't think too many can disagree with that. He has more in his arsenal than Froch.

          Comment

          • LacedUp
            Still Smokin'
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 29171
            • 781
            • 381
            • 132,163

            #45
            Originally posted by Andrew5550
            True. I mean I love Froch - but everyone should take their defeats like a man. This is the only thing that slightly bugs me about Froch - he's complaining. Also he says his UD loss to Froch was a really really close decision. It wasn't. It was clear as day. Kessler's was a lot tighter of course, but I heard some experts having it 8-4 Kessler. Kessler was just busier throughout and IMO edged it. If he goes back to the Calzaghe days and keeps behind his strong left jab and good movement he should have this. I think Kessler got too much into a tear up compared to what he should have. But it's hard not to of course.
            UD loss to Ward*

            Comment

            • gmc_rfc_06
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2010
              • 9486
              • 282
              • 131
              • 16,947

              #46
              This is what I've been waiting for.

              Big fan of both guys, both are top quality warriors in the ring and also class out of it. I had the first fight a draw, and I fully expect another violent meeting this time.

              Comment

              • Weebler I
                El Weeblerito I
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 31092
                • 1,459
                • 1,648
                • 54,550

                #47
                Originally posted by Andrew5550
                True. I mean I love Froch - but everyone should take their defeats like a man. This is the only thing that slightly bugs me about Froch - he's complaining. Also he says his UD loss to Ward was a really really close decision. It wasn't. It was clear as day. Kessler's was a lot tighter of course, but I heard some experts having it 8-4 Kessler. Kessler was just busier throughout and IMO edged it. If he goes back to the Calzaghe days and keeps behind his strong left jab and good movement he should have this. I think Kessler got too much into a tear up compared to what he should have. But it's hard not to of course.
                Froch acknowledged recently that it wasn't close in his view. What he usually points out is that the judges watching at ringside felt it was close (see cards), so he gives himself a shot in a rematch.

                Comment

                • komodo
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 2139
                  • 687
                  • 1,033
                  • 9,452

                  #48
                  Prime for prime Kessler beats Froch. However I have to give Froch the slight advantage in a rematch especially if it's in the UK.

                  WAR COBRA!

                  Comment

                  • P4P Opinion
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 1778
                    • 143
                    • 73
                    • 8,170

                    #49
                    Originally posted by BattlingNelson
                    Froch has done a great job by repeating over and over that the first fight would have been a win for him had it been in the UK.

                    If that had been a win for froch, it would have been robbery of the decade. Kessler clearly won. Almost all of the posters on boxingscene had him as winner. Same for the british media. Punchstat numbers was also clearly in favour of the dane.

                    Too many people drinking the Froch cool-aid.

                    No, just no.

                    If you really think it would have been a robbery to give the decision to Froch, you're more biased than I thought. If you know how to score a fight, you know that the fight was very close. About four or five of the rounds could have been given either way. A points verdict for either fighter beyond a two point lead would have been robbery, but nothing else. Nothing remotely clear about it.

                    Comment

                    • GoldSugar
                      Banned
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 512
                      • 18
                      • 0
                      • 602

                      #50
                      Props to both these guys. That's good money. More than Ward and Dawson got even

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP