Which one is the real robbery..Pac vs JMM 1,2,3 or Pac vs Bradley?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cinci Champ
    And Still!!!
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2012
    • 9376
    • 301
    • 139
    • 23,582

    #31
    well you could argue the pac man jmm fights anyway you want either fighter cant say same pac bradley. just crazy that jmm didnt have one victory before the ko, if he would of even gotten even 1 decision in the first 3 fights i would have more faith in the other decisions. but bradley pac is your answer not worth even arguing. fact that all the fights in question had pac man in em make you wonder if in every fight bob arum had judges in pocket and thats not meant to be a troll statement.

    Comment

    • El_Cholo
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 2330
      • 118
      • 48
      • 11,120

      #32
      Pacquiao vs Bradley without question was the real robbery.

      I thought the first fight between Pacquiao vs Marquez was the clearest of the first 3 fights.

      Had Pacquiao edging the 2nd fight with the third being a draw.

      Comment

      • bojangles1987
        bo jungle
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 41118
        • 1,326
        • 357
        • 63,028

        #33
        While Marquez deserved at least one of the first 3, there is an argument either way in all three fights. There's no real argument either way with Pac-Bradley, Pac got flat out robbed.

        Comment

        • Cinci Champ
          And Still!!!
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2012
          • 9376
          • 301
          • 139
          • 23,582

          #34
          honestly jmm could be 4-0 to pac man that in itself is amazing

          Comment

          • fitefan
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 396
            • 18
            • 0
            • 6,483

            #35
            technically....there were no robberies imo. if you want to label one a robbery i'd go with pac/jmm 1 in favor of jmm. He dominated pac after the 1st round. yeah he landed some nice shots here and there but jmm thoroughly outclassed the overaggressive pac

            the rest were very close but i felt pac barely lost all of them with the bradley fight being the best candidate to say pac won. bradley's defense and bodywork has ridiculously ignored. pac was credited with so many deflected and rolled punches it wasn't funny

            had bradley thrown his punches properly as opposed to looping slaps then maybe people stop being so dismissive of what he accomplished. rewatch the fight without the hbo nuthugging and you'll see what i mean

            Comment

            • Rome-By-Ko
              The winner Is
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 20157
              • 323
              • 332
              • 29,833

              #36
              Originally posted by bojangles1987
              While Marquez deserved at least one of the first 3, there is an argument either way in all three fights. There's no real argument either way with Pac-Bradley, Pac got flat out robbed.
              I can make an argument Bradley won..People throw around the word robbery far to much on this forum..Just like the word duck and exposed..

              Comment

              • Chrismart
                OK Jim...
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Apr 2007
                • 14291
                • 837
                • 1,762
                • 308,493

                #37
                IMO The first 3 Pacquiao Vs Marquez fight's were close fights that could of gone either way. While Pacquiao clearly won against Bradley.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP