At the end of the day its not about being undefeated but the quality of opponents that you took on and beat in your career that matters the most.
You're absolutely correct. Now tell me, why did Floyd retire instead of fighting Cotto, Margarito, Mosley, Williams etc. in 2008? Those would've been career defining/ top quality fights.
You're absolutely correct. Now tell me, why did Floyd retire instead of fighting Cotto, Margarito, Mosley, Williams etc. in 2008? Those would've been career defining/ top quality fights.
Because of self-preservation, duh!
but seriously, being undefeated doesn't mean much if you've only faced s!tty opponents.
You notice how flowmo alts always flood pacquiao hate threads, but in Floyd threads, only normal posters post, with the occasional alt.
Yeah flowmos. You guys are the alt kings. Fuggin losers.
Pot...kettle.. Why are you talking about Pac in a Mayweather thread? your just as bad dude.
I don't think fighting undefeated fighters necessarily sums up the quality of the opposition, but it sure would have been better for him to fight Cotto when he had his 0 or even ortiz.
You're absolutely correct. Now tell me, why did Floyd retire instead of fighting Cotto, Margarito, Mosley, Williams etc. in 2008? Those would've been career defining/ top quality fights.
Floyd definitely could have had an undefeated Cotto...
Comment