Marquez has never tested positive so what's the big deal?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NYTimes openly suspicious of PED use by JMM
Collapse
-
Originally posted by radioraheem View PostAt the end of the day, it doesn't matter what the NY Times writes, doesn't matter what Yahoo writes, etc. It's crying over already spilled milk. Damage has already been done. And Marquez's physique this time around is not significantly different from the third fight. Where were these writers back then? Marquez looked beastly for the third fight too.
But again, what's done is done. Maybe next time, for Pacquaio's next fight, these writers and all the complainers will demand BEFOREHAND that Pacquaio and his opponent undergo random drug testing for his next fight.Last edited by boxer.exposed; 12-10-2012, 02:50 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by joesaiditstrue View Postthere will never be testing like vada or usada implemented by a commission because 1) the cost is too high 2) the commissions most likely couldn't care less if a fighter is juicing, as it would make for more exciting fights
if they truly cared about PED's, the penalties would be MUCH harsher. fact is, they really don't care as much about it as say loaded gloves
And yes the penalties should be much harsher, if they want to deter cheaters. Where is the Lamount Peterson ban? Its crazy that congressional inquires have been launched over PED use in baseball and cycling, but when it comes to the sport where PED use is truly dangerous, boxing, they're silent.
I think its only the fighters that care, but Manny isn't one of them. Well he paid for his simplistic, philosophical outlook. He didn't even care when Bradley was awarded the decision.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by CHOWWOKKA View PostMarquez has never tested positive so what's the big deal?
JMM has always been an experimental boxer, as the NYtimes pointed out with him drinking his own piss.
So, if they're not going to sufficiently test him, why wouldn't he experiment with juicing? The whole reason for him juicing is because he knows he will not test positive with the pathetic tests the comissions do, and he's got an expert drugs test evader too.
The NYtimes is a gatekeeper for what is taboo and acceptable for a lot of people in America, regardless of what you guys think. The fact they're questioning his win, the fact they're implying JMM used PEDs, means so are millions of people all over the world. JMM never looked like this when he was young, never had this power when he was young. But at almost 40, hes a body builder, with unquestionably more power than before?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Skittlez View Postlol @ morons who think the NY TIMES are secret Pac- T A R DS
lmao.
idiots
NyTimes hates Blacks and Browns! I bet the writer is a fat yank who married a Filipina (through mail) and now he thinks he's half Pinoy.
I hope Marquez sues NYTImes for this!
Comment
-
Originally posted by PACnPBFsuck View PostThis article should be posted after Marquez post fight test comes back.
For years, Mr. Heredia said, he helped his clients flout the rules and easily avoided detection. Substances like human growth hormone and the blood booster erythropoietin, or EPO, are still virtually impossible to detect, and "it is still easy to use testosterone" with fast-acting creams, he said.
"You combine all these things -boom! - you get amazing results," Mr. Heredia said.
Comment
-
Comment