lol, pac vs rios is a horrible fight. horrible fight. u cant complain about floyd/guerrero or canelo and approve that fight. its a horrible fight.
Pacquiao will be fighting Brandon Rios win or lose tonight
Collapse
-
-
^^^^This
I consider Top Rank fights "Boxing Entertainment" as opposed to professional sports. Whoever Arum wants to win will win barring a knockout.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
My theory is that Arum expected the fight to be a lot closer and wanted to make money on a rematch. Which is still a possibility. There will be probably a mini-tournament next year:
April - Pac/Rios
May - Marquez/Bradley
Fall - Pac vs. Marquez 5; Pac vs. Bradley 2; Rios vs. Marquez; Rios vs. Bradley
Don't be shocked if tonight's fight ends in a draw.Comment
-
David diaz???? David fkng diaz???? Are you serious dude?Comment
-
Mayweather and Manny are more so where Shaq was in the middle of his time with the Heat. Shaq was way way way past it with Cleveland and Boston.Sure; even though I already made my argument clear, I'm not endorsing or complaining about Pacquiaos opponent. My argument is that who Pacquiao, Floyd, and Marquez fight is irrelevant to me as they're in the twilight of their careers, and people shouldn't get worked up about it. Leave it to the nuthuggers and casual fans. If anyone beats any of them at this point, people will just say it's because they were past their prime anyway (Or in Pacquiao's case refuse to acknowledge the decision).
Like I said, no one got mad at Shaq for the way he played when he was a Celtic. Thomas Hauser, talking about Bhop I think, called fighters in this stage of their career, as being on the "retirement tour." Where they've accomplished their big feats but they're famous, so they keep fighting and stack that money.
That's how I feel about it, so that's why I wouldn't care if Floyd fights Spadafora in Dubai or Pacquiao fights Brandon Rios in Singapore or some ****. It simply doesn't matter.Comment
-
Interesting points, and I agree to an extent - about people's obsessions with fighters like Pac/Floyd taking legacy defining fights each time out. I've had people tell me on here that they would rather Pac fight Paulie than fighting Rios because Paulie has a belt at 147.So what? That's a fun fight.
Pacquiao, Mayweather, Marquez... these guys are legends and the best of their era, but their greatest days are behind them. Fights they make at this stage just aren't very relevant in my opinion and are taking place to stock up their retirement funds. I got no problem with that, and am looking forward to tonights fight. Getting upset over opponent choices is silly. They already proved what they had to prove, and now theyre getting paid. Good for them.
So what if Pacquiao fights Rios? ****, who cares if Floyd fights ****ing Spadafora in Dubai? Did people get mad at Shaq for the way he played when he was a Celtic?
Where I disagree is giving Pac/Floyd/JMM passes for every fight. That's good for them that they're stocking up their retirement pot - but not fun for me, or us.
And despite the snobbery people have about the word "fun" or "exciting" in boxing, I think we all lose sight of the entertainment aspect and how crucial it is. And this is coming from someone who intellectualises boxing and considers it an art form.
I love and support boxing, and it's difficult to watch Pac in fights where's he's getting booed cos the opponent won't engage and Manny doesn't know how to cut the ring off. Pac brings mainstream interest and I'd rather he was in a barnburner than a stinkfest. Rios will get blown out but he'll make a bunch of fans with his style and heart.
Fights should either be legacy builders, competitive or exciting. That is why I have issues with Floyd against Guerrero, because it's none of those things.
Pac vs Rios? Fun as fook.Comment
Comment