Originally posted by fitefan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How can you watch this and tell me Bradley was dominated?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostYeah same here - had Manny winning the first time I viewed it but I thought it was close. I never thought it was decisive. Hell, how could you, when he faded in the latter rounds?
But when I put the beer down, watched it by myself...I realized what I hadn't seen before. And that was...Pacquiao missed a lot. A lot. And ate a lot of body shots--and several headshots as well. He was roughed up in several rounds that I hadn't noticed before. And Bradley was in total control in the championship rounds. It's clear why people don't want to see a rematch--not because it was so boring (Pacquiao-Marquez III was a snoozer too), it's because Bradley could beat Manny even more decisively next time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostYeah same here - had Manny winning the first time I viewed it but I thought it was close. I never thought it was decisive. Hell, how could you, when he faded in the latter rounds?
But when I put the beer down, watched it by myself...I realized what I hadn't seen before. And that was...Pacquiao missed a lot. A lot. And ate a lot of body shots--and several headshots as well. He was roughed up in several rounds that I hadn't noticed before. And Bradley was in total control in the championship rounds. It's clear why people don't want to see a rematch--not because it was so boring (Pacquiao-Marquez III was a snoozer too), it's because Bradley could beat Manny even more decisively next time.Last edited by Dome; 12-03-2012, 11:47 AM.
Comment
-
I scored it 7-5 for Pac on fight night and scored it 8-4 Pac on rewatch. Pac deserved the victory that night. That being said, the reason people don't want to see Bradley-Pac II is because Bradley will win, in an ugly yet clear fashion. I don't think it was Pac gassing the last three rounds so much that Bradley finally got the timing of Pac's explosive offensive combinations down. He was able to counter pac' offensive similarly to how JMM does. I would expect a guy with very high ring IQ such as Bradley to be able to adapt to Pac much more quickly or even immediately in a second fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MR. LARRYXYou can tell after the fight he was hardly touched in his fight with Manny,his defense was great and he made Manny miss more than i have seen in awhile.Notice everyone else Manny has fought had swolen,battered and bruised faces after the fight.Yet they said he landed the most on Bradley so why was he unmarked.
why all the controversy?cause a mega star lost? Bradley won this fight and can't seem to get any fights due to his negative style,it is hard to look good against him because he is a very cagey fighter
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
Comment
-
OL, when Pac fans says something about JMM's face during the 3rd fight, it don't matter of what ever the face looks like.
Now, a hater is bringing it up on the face of Pac. Double standards.
Pull your head out of your a$$, wipe the tears out of your eyes, look at the mirror, and say 3x, "Pacquiao is not a nightmare".
".
Comment
-
Originally posted by MR. LARRYX View PostYou can tell after the fight he was hardly touched in his fight with Manny,his defense was great and he made Manny miss more than i have seen in awhile.Notice everyone else Manny has fought had swolen,battered and bruised faces after the fight.Yet they said he landed the most on Bradley so why was he unmarked.
why all the controversy?cause a mega star lost? Bradley won this fight and can't seem to get any fights due to his negative style,it is hard to look good against him because he is a very cagey fighter
Comment
Comment