Joel Diaz "We would have had more credibility if we had lost to Pacquiao"
Collapse
-
-
Totally agree because while Tim would have a loss on his ledger people would have realised that Timmy put up a solid effort especially down the stretch but instead since everyone was so enraged with the decision instead off blaming the judge's Timmy gets all the blame it's a shame because he did give a good account off himself too a big audience -
dur dur dur backpeddling all night, Bradley should return the belt, wheelchair.
Diaz is right. Bradley isn't even able to capitalize off of the hate that he's getting for 'robbing' (the judges robbed Pacquiao, not Bradley) a sacred cowComment
-
Totally agree because while Tim would have a loss on his ledger people would have realised that Timmy put up a solid effort especially down the stretch but instead since everyone was so enraged with the decision instead off blaming the judge's Timmy gets all the blame it's a shame because he did give a good account off himself too a big audience
people are so enamored with pac he gets credit for punches thrown as opposed to punches landedComment
-
Comment
-
Also take into account the HBO crew are calling the fight live from a single angle by ringside and only have replays available during the breaks and both guys are quick punchers and Pacquiao was pressing the fight and clearly landed the harder more impressive punches even if some of the ones they called didn't land.
Pacquaio displayed clean effective punching, effective aggression, Ring generalship and even defense (Bradley landed 19% or 159/839 compared to 253/751 or 34% of his total punches). Bradley was the busier fighter but it's clear Pacquiao won. It wasn't even close IMO.
Marquez deserved the 3rd fight against Pacquiao but that was close, Bradley clearly lost and got awarded the decision. Marquez has a reason to go around saying that he deserved the decision against Manny, Bradley has to go around and boast that he won the fight to try and justify the decision.Comment
-
I've seen the video, I could make a very similar video picking a choosing punches that Bradley doesn't land. Both guys threw upwards of 700 punches if I remember correctly?
Also take into account the HBO crew are calling the fight live from a single angle by ringside and only have replays available during the breaks and both guys are quick punchers and Pacquiao was pressing the fight and clearly landed the harder more impressive punches even if some of the ones they called didn't land.
Pacquaio displayed clean effective punching, effective aggression, Ring generalship and even defense (Bradley landed 19% or 159/839 compared to 253/751 or 34% of his total punches). Bradley was the busier fighter but it's clear Pacquiao won. It wasn't even close IMO.
Marquez deserved the 3rd fight against Pacquiao but that was close, Bradley clearly lost and got awarded the decision. Marquez has a reason to go around saying that he deserved the decision against Manny, Bradley has to go around and boast that he won the fight to try and justify the decision.
bradley did not clearly lose imo. he did enough to win. and how can you say that pac showed effective aggression and punching when bradley made him miss so much? i find that bafflingComment
Comment