Comments Thread For: Jose Ocampo Named As New Opponent For Ricky Burns

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JakeNDaBox
    The Jake of All Trades
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2006
    • 2375
    • 340
    • 38
    • 14,702

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Jose Ocampo Named As New Opponent For Ricky Burns

    By Jake Donovan - Ricky Burns once again has an opponent for his December 15 lightweight title defense in London.

    The streaking two-division titlist will now face Jose Ocampo of the Philippines, who replaces an injured Liam Walsh.

    "I’d say that this is going to be the hardest fight of my career so far against a young hungry challenger who will be looking to take my title,” said Burns (35-2, 10KO), who makes the third defense of the lightweight belt he won over a year ago.

    “Filipino fighters are as tough as they come, just look at (Manny) Pacquiao and Nonito Donaire. [T]hey come to have a fight and Ocampo will do just that. If he fights like those two, as people say he does, then I’ll be in for a tough night.” [Click Here To Read More]
  • ROSS CALIFORNIA
    Tyson fan
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 69864
    • 997
    • 1,956
    • 113,453

    #2
    Burns wants no part of Broner. Can you blame him?

    Comment

    • Hougigo
      Gossip Girl
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2011
      • 38755
      • 730
      • 236
      • 47,223

      #3
      Hahahahahahaha.... funnies

      Comment

      • Priest Andretti
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Nov 2012
        • 479
        • 19
        • 1
        • 613

        #4
        What happened to Broner?

        Comment

        • Kilrain
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 3006
          • 117
          • 52
          • 9,874

          #5
          Originally posted by Priest Andretti
          What happened to Broner?
          Burns already had a defence lined up for December, he and his promoter are on record as saying they want a Broner unification next, sometime in March/April. Pretty well-documented.

          Comment

          • Clegg
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 24673
            • 3,726
            • 2,307
            • 233,274

            #6
            It's a real shame that Burns is with a promoter who isn't willing to let him make the most of his talent. I don't think he'd beat Broner but he might be better than DeMarco, Vasquez and Abril. Or he might lose to all of them. I doubt we'll get a chance to find out.

            Also, while this is a late replacement and therefore it's not surprising that the opponent isn't that good, the original opponent (Walsh) was not a legitimate choice for a world title defence by a guy who claims to be the best in the division.

            Comment

            • SnakeVen0m
              The Voice of Reason
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2012
              • 4863
              • 294
              • 309
              • 13,430

              #7
              The last two people Ocampo faced didn't even have a winning record WTF?

              Comment

              • ddangerous
                Neck Mohican
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2012
                • 5203
                • 121
                • 626
                • 11,814

                #8
                Originally posted by Kilrain
                Burns already had a defence lined up for December, he and his promoter are on record as saying they want a Broner unification next, sometime in March/April. Pretty well-documented.
                This ^^^. I don't necessarily think this means Team Burns are ducking Broner. I think they might just be sticking with the original game plan. Cause this is pretty well-documented as mentioned above.

                Comment

                • Boxing1706
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Sep 2012
                  • 150
                  • 6
                  • 0
                  • 6,195

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Clegg
                  It's a real shame that Burns is with a promoter who isn't willing to let him make the most of his talent. I don't think he'd beat Broner but he might be better than DeMarco, Vasquez and Abril. Or he might lose to all of them. I doubt we'll get a chance to find out.

                  Also, while this is a late replacement and therefore it's not surprising that the opponent isn't that good, the original opponent (Walsh) was not a legitimate choice for a world title defence by a guy who claims to be the best in the division.
                  Burns is fast becoming another Joe Calzaghe defending his title against a long line of bums who have no business fighting for world honors.Gavin Rees would have been a half decent test for Burns but thats the only competitive fight in the UK for him lightweight.Frank Warren his promoter will keep Ricky fighting bums for as long as he can until they are backed into a corner and have no choice but to fight a decent contender.I dont think the Broner fight will ever happen,Broner will fight one more time at lightweight and then move up to Jr WW while Burns will stay in Scotland fighting unranked opponents.

                  Comment

                  • ShoulderRoll
                    Join The Great Resist
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 56274
                    • 10,166
                    • 5,034
                    • 763,445

                    #10
                    Walsh was a bad opponent for Burns but now Ocampo....that's even worse.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP