Did the JMM vs Pac#3 fight influenced in the Bradley vs Pac decision?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • elgranluchadore
    i did it
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 1823
    • 81
    • 41
    • 8,235

    #1

    Did the JMM vs Pac#3 fight influenced in the Bradley vs Pac decision?

    I mean if pacquiao would have koed jmm like he was supposed to and came to the bradley fight with a bunch of momentum. i bet no judge would have dared to score it for bradley
    it seems to me like the judges were afraid of receiving the same backlash of the jmm decision so they were more inclined to give rounds to bradley

    At first i thought the decision was part of a scheme to make more money on a rematch but idk know
  • Jack Napier
    Whores on Our Cul de Sac
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8668
    • 812
    • 424
    • 16,030

    #2
    no
    Arum knew Floyd was just plain never gonna fight Pac
    so he set up the robbery to ensure a Pac-Bradley 2
    people saw right through it though
    fight wasn't that good and it didn't sell much
    so it's Pac-JMM 4 while Bradley goes back to the drawing board

    Comment

    • Zopilote
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Oct 2012
      • 176
      • 9
      • 13
      • 6,434

      #3
      Karma is a *****.

      Comment

      • KiloTeague
        Undisputed Champion
        • Oct 2008
        • 1047
        • 42
        • 15
        • 8,694

        #4
        Originally posted by Jack Napier
        no
        Arum knew Floyd was just plain never gonna fight Pac
        so he set up the robbery to ensure a Pac-Bradley 2
        people saw right through it though
        fight wasn't that good and it didn't sell much
        so it's Pac-JMM 4 while Bradley goes back to the drawing board
        If Pac won so convincingly and it was such a robbery, why is it that Bradley had not one mark or bruise on his face all while breaking his ankle and foot in the second round?

        Comment

        • -MAKAVELLI-
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 50080
          • 3,580
          • 2,792
          • 169,000

          #5
          no...it was PAC's diva act that influenced the judges


          you make those old farts wait while you watch a basketball game? they gave the close rounds to Bradley



          that's what he gets for being a f0cking Celtics fan


          blame that loss on the green turds

          Comment

          • Jack Napier
            Whores on Our Cul de Sac
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 8668
            • 812
            • 424
            • 16,030

            #6
            Originally posted by KiloTeague
            If Pac won so convincingly and it was such a robbery, why is it that Bradley had not one mark or bruise on his face all while breaking his ankle and foot in the second round?
            what the fuck is with this logic?
            Bradley lost 9 outta 12 rds, so what if he wasn't busted up? :laugh:
            people wanna give Bradley credit just for not getting Cotto'd
            you can get your ass kicked without getting cut or swollen

            Comment

            • dibzvincent143
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 5343
              • 359
              • 204
              • 52,527

              #7
              yes, i think it did for some reasons. judges became critical to pac during the bradley match to regain some of the damages after the marquez III, thinking that they are actually doing a great job balancing things, but then it just worsen.. i hope they just gave marquez the win and bradley the L.

              Comment

              • CHOWWOKKA
                lats of peace
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Oct 2011
                • 7928
                • 1,121
                • 178
                • 49,708

                #8
                Originally posted by Jack Napier
                no
                Arum knew Floyd was just plain never gonna fight Pac
                so he set up the robbery to ensure a Pac-Bradley 2

                people saw right through it though
                fight wasn't that good and it didn't sell much
                so it's Pac-JMM 4 while Bradley goes back to the drawing board
                Explain that one?

                Comment

                • johnm is...
                  ****in *** Broads
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 10700
                  • 820
                  • 1,382
                  • 48,813

                  #9
                  Was Bob's way of saying "I'll rob absolutely anybody".

                  Comment

                  • gmc_rfc_06
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 9486
                    • 282
                    • 131
                    • 16,947

                    #10
                    Absolutely.

                    There was outrage after the Pac-JMM III robbery and they made this one up. Both fights had clear winners and neither was given the W they earned.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP