Shocking PED revelations by T. Hauser. GBP, Mayweather, Quillin, Morales.
Collapse
-
Comment
-
They do have a basis to proceed with legal action against this guy. Again, there's nothing in his article that irrefutably says that GBP is guilty of any wrong doing. Some of GBP actions are questionable at best, but there's not much to go on to flat out accuse them of corruption.Comment
-
I'm not saying that they don't have evidence, but if they do then why they just rely on testimonies to prove that Armstrong was doping himself?
Armstrong decided not to defend himself because the reality is that it wouldn't have mattered. Just because you don't say anything doesn't automatically mean that you're guilty of all charges.
USADA is supposed to be a huge organization that tests athletes for every single possible drug, yet they end up relying on freaking testimonies as proofs? That's what I don't like about them, I mean if you can't catch Lance Armstrong (who according to them was using PEDs for many years) then why spend all these thousands of dollars on testing and laboratories, I mean c'mon I expected a lot more from USADA.
About the Floyd thing, I just don't think it's true, especially without evidence and again, what's their motive to try to hide something like this? They went for Armstrong even without blood samples that prove he's guilty, yet they're trying to protect Floyd even when they have positive blood samples? Doesn't make sense to me.Comment
-
Comment
-
Yeah methinks Conte is pulling the strings here. I suspect he's the source...or is the one connected to the source regarding Mayweather. There are a lot of things missing in this article and you have to wonder why. Actually it's pretty obvious. Bob Arum is somewhere laughing right now.
Not to mention how much he quotes Bob Arum, just letting his words hang out there like they are real important and not words meant to benefit Bob Arum.
He does have some interesting stuff sometimes but what gets left out is often as interesting as what he says.Comment
-
They do have a basis to proceed with legal action against this guy. Again, there's nothing in his article that irrefutably says that GBP is guilty of any wrong doing. Some of GBP actions are questionable at best, but there's not much to go on to flat out accuse them of corruption.Comment
Comment