Shocking PED revelations by T. Hauser. GBP, Mayweather, Quillin, Morales.
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
The rumered failed tests that no one heard about until now? Because there is no one who dislikes mayweather enough to have released this info when it happened. So youre taking a rumor and stating it as a fact? You have lost all creditbilityComment
-
it will be terrible for the sport, and unfortunately I have a feeling we could be about to see it, he has to at least respond to this. i dunno ... who knows it could end up at the cycling point where it's not who was a drug cheat but who wasn't ... fernando escartin the only out of 21 podium finishers in 7 years not on drugsComment
-
Boxing is about to be exposed for rampant PED abuse. Much like Cycling and Track and Field. In the 88' 100 meter final where poor Ben Johnson was the fall guy but 6 out of those 8 finalists were either later busted for PED use or known to have used PEDs but swept under the rug by USADA...*cough* Carl Lewis *cough*Comment
-
-
The main word "rumour" I don't believe that Mayweather is a drug cheat. But don't label me as a floydiot or anything because I don't believe Pacquiao does either. It would have been found out before this if it was the case not just Chinese whispers but actual proof.
Hell, if Victor Conte is throwing out this bull**** you'd know it ain't a fact. He would have sold him out in court like he done with other athletes if it was true!Comment
-
Your right he wasn't But you got to look at it funny side
Floyd haters are more often then not Pacquiao fans. Those are the same people who are going to bump this thread for weeks on end carrying these rumors as if they are fact. They are going to recite how credible T.Hauser is and how he is one of the best writers in boxing. And they are going to **** their pants when "Boxing's pope said Pacquiao lost"
BUT that's all boxingscene nonsense, good article green kComment
-
my problem with this is who do u write an article as a jorunalist and use rumours as the basis for your argument? thats not journalism. thats unacceptable and its irresponsible. if u are gonna report something, u better damn well have the facts and the primary sources to back it up. i dont get how journalists get away with this, in every other professional literary field, u could never do that. but its ok to post rumor as fact. compelling article? sure if u are so ready to believe whatever someone tells u.Comment
-
my problem with this is who do u write an article as a jorunalist and use rumours as the basis for your argument? thats not journalism. thats unacceptable and its irresponsible. if u are gonna report something, u better damn well have the facts and the primary sources to back it up. i dont get how journalists get away with this, in every other professional literary field, u could never do that. but its ok to post rumor as fact. compelling article? sure if u are so ready to believe whatever someone tells u.Comment
Comment