wait? whats new here? there was an article on floyd mayweather supposedly failing 3 tests ages ago? is it just more believable now because of who has written the article?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Shocking PED revelations by T. Hauser. GBP, Mayweather, Quillin, Morales.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Dr Rumack View PostThat's the general problem with the T-E ratio and why VADA are regarded more highly in this respect.
Lance Armstrong and his team used to wear testosterone patches during the day, during the race stages, and provided they took them off before going to bed, their testosterone levels would be come in under the 4:1 ratio when they were tested in the morning.
VADA's CIR testing immediately goes looking for synthetic testosterone, rather than looking for unusual levels. This is why some journalists were questioning Mayweather's decision to use USADA instead. They're cheaper but their tests are not as good.
Then again, Floyd has supposedly never heard of TRT so maybe that's why the cheaper testing didn't bother him.
It's false that USADA doesn't do 4:1. And USADA has come out and said that. Also it is absolutely false that USADA is cheaper in cost than VADA. Rather, the fact is the opposite. VADA is much cheaper than USADA, which is why Golden Boy first went with them, while the Floyd fights used USADA which was much more expensive. And saying VADA is superior to USADA is just more Conte influenced nonsense because USADA brought down Conte/BALCO. He criticizes USADA at any given chance. Anyway, the reality is that USADA is superior because they are much more experienced in the testing game. But VADA is a great alternative nonetheless and can be just as effective.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shade darkar View Postwait? whats new here? there was an article on floyd mayweather supposedly failing 3 tests ages ago? is it just more believable now because of who has written the article?
The article throws a lot of interesting ideas around.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ryn0 View PostNo, but the idea that all 3 times the B sample was not tested because of extenuating circumstances is suspect and Golden Boys reaction to positive tests despite fronting a clean sport act is also.
The article throws a lot of interesting ideas around.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Market View PostWhat's sad is all u PAC lovers/Floyd haters..equates to the same things nowadays will take this and run with it like the writer paid y'all. I'm still trying to figure out why out of all people will they cover for Floyd. This writer is obviously looking for some attention, and the sad part is he's going to get it with lawsuits if he doesn't have the "so called waiver" that USADA supposedly have mayweather. Another attempt by some idiot writer who doesn't like Floyd, golden boy and all affiliates. Prob on bob arums payroll...lol
Comment
-
in the end,
people who think they have the moral authority on what's right is wrong.
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH USING PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUG.
Denying ped use is denying the next step in human evolution.
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=563165
50-100 years from now, ped use will be as regular as taking vitamin c.
People use performance enhancing in all aspects of life yet somehow when athletes use them it becomes morally wrong?
The public has been brainwashed into thinking ped use is evil when in reality its human progress.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ryn0 View PostNo, but the idea that all 3 times the B sample was not tested because of extenuating circumstances is suspect and Golden Boys reaction to positive tests despite fronting a clean sport act is also.
The article throws a lot of interesting ideas around.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DTMB View Postin the end,
people who think they have the moral authority on what's right is wrong.
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH USING PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUG.
Denying ped use is denying the next step in human evolution.
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=563165
50-100 years from now, ped use will be as regular as taking vitamin c.
People use performance enhancing in all aspects of life yet somehow when athletes use them it becomes morally wrong?
The public has been brainwashed into thinking ped use is evil when in reality its human progress.
The playing field is never truly level of course, but nothing else comes remotely close to distorting it in the way that performance enhancing drugs do. You can never train hard enough naturally to match the stamina of a guy on EPO. You can never gain the kind of muscle mass naturally that you can gain with anabolic steroids.
It makes a mockery of the notion of competitive sport. It would no longer be a competition between athletes, it would be a competition between laboratories and doctors.
And to a certain extent, in the absence of adequate testing, that's exactly what it is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View PostI agreed with this.
In my original post I said people are accusing Marquez of the same things they accused Pac of.
Not sure what the argument is here.
Originally posted by boricuajr23 View PostWell where do they start? if true, we are talking about further investigations, license suspensions, i mean, who is gonna take action? this is or could get messy as F&*^! Alot of ppl say a robbery decision in this sport is a black eye to the sport of boxing but this is taking it to another level IMO.
Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Postlol, dude, shut up. grown men are talking. dont u have adrien broner vids to be watching? go cry some more.
Comment
Comment