Broner still a hypejob?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • leonthegee
    Undisputed Champion
    • Jul 2009
    • 1428
    • 83
    • 246
    • 7,583

    #31
    Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby
    People think he s hype job because he's gotten 2 gift decisions in his career already. Everyone knows he's talented but he's already shown that he is very beatable.
    This is boxing not college football and you are aloud to get better. Boxers usually improve the most their first three to four yrs. The PDL fight was what 2 yrs ago. So he had a couple bad outings, are you gonna hold that against him his entire carreer. Dudes 23 with 5 kids who knows what was in his head leading up to the fight.

    Comment

    • I Love Jesus!
      With a side of Freedom
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2012
      • 5458
      • 332
      • 377
      • 12,467

      #32
      Originally posted by Roy Jones Jnr
      How do you haters see him now?

      Is he still a hypejob in your eyes?

      Or have you changed your mind?

      He may well never be as good as Mayweather, i doubt many ever will but Broner is a special talent.

      You haters better recognise.

      Canelo will be next to shut you haters up.
      he looks like the real deal. I'd rather watch him fight then watch mayweather run all night.

      Comment

      • Danny Gunz
        Smokin'
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 10365
        • 520
        • 550
        • 19,983

        #33
        The only thing I question is that he has been HUGE against every one of his opponents so far. I wonder what it'd be like if/when he moves up in weight and is fighting big guys

        Comment

        • CubanGuyNYC
          Latin From Manhattan
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 15263
          • 1,620
          • 1,587
          • 112,127

          #34
          Originally posted by Barnburner
          I never thought he was a hypejob but I didn't think he would be as good as he showed last night.

          He went up a few points in my book.
          Pretty much my thoughts, although I did lean towards "hypejob". I wasn't impressed with Broner against Ponce De Leon; but if he had fought Danny the way he did DeMarco, that fight wouldn't have gone the distance. Adrien is for real.

          Comment

          • I Love Jesus!
            With a side of Freedom
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2012
            • 5458
            • 332
            • 377
            • 12,467

            #35
            Originally posted by yoz
            Why? I don't buy PPV fights? So, i'm not entirely sure how he'd make a fast buck out of me...

            I didn't watch last night's fight. In fact, i've never watched a full Broner fight; just a few clips on YouTube.

            Just because you're nut-hugging the guy, there's no need to force it on everyone here.
            you should give him a chance he's an exciting fighter actually. he's aggressive and doesn't run like mayweather.

            Comment

            • CubanGuyNYC
              Latin From Manhattan
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 15263
              • 1,620
              • 1,587
              • 112,127

              #36
              Originally posted by Danny Gunz
              The only thing I question is that he has been HUGE against every one of his opponents so far. I wonder what it'd be like if/when he moves up in weight and is fighting big guys
              That's true, but you can say that about other fighters. It's common for guys to fight at lower weights to take advantage of their natural size. Obviously, if Broner moved up far enough, he'd eventually get pummeled.

              Comment

              • !! Shawn
                !! Shown
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 9810
                • 670
                • 724
                • 31,455

                #37
                Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby
                People think he s hype job because he's gotten 2 gift decisions in his career already. Everyone knows he's talented but he's already shown that he is very beatable.
                This is the truth. Mayweather had been very decisive in all of his wins at this point in his career.

                Comment

                • CubanGuyNYC
                  Latin From Manhattan
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 15263
                  • 1,620
                  • 1,587
                  • 112,127

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Davis40
                  you should give him a chance he's an exciting fighter actually. he's aggressive and doesn't run like mayweather.
                  Broner stood in the pocket last night against a come-forward fighter and literally handed him his ass.

                  Comment

                  • !! Shawn
                    !! Shown
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 9810
                    • 670
                    • 724
                    • 31,455

                    #39
                    Originally posted by leonthegee
                    This is boxing not college football and you are aloud to get better. Boxers usually improve the most their first three to four yrs. The PDL fight was what 2 yrs ago. So he had a couple bad outings, are you gonna hold that against him his entire carreer. Dudes 23 with 5 kids who knows what was in his head leading up to the fight.
                    That obviously proves hes not the brightest bulb in the room. 5 kids... at 23? Wanna bet none of them were planned?

                    Comment

                    • Roy Jones Jnr
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Oct 2011
                      • 5123
                      • 253
                      • 276
                      • 23,034

                      #40
                      Originally posted by mathed
                      Might want to study up yourself there chief.

                      to acknowledge formally: such as; to admit as being lord or sovereign; to admit as being of a particular status… See the full definition


                      rec·og·nize/ˈrekigˌnīz/
                      Verb:

                      Identify (someone or something) from having encountered them before; know again: "I recognized her when her wig fell off".
                      Identify from knowledge of appearance or character: "Pat is good at recognizing wildflowers".


                      Both work, i've always thought the correct British English way to spell it is 'recognise'.

                      Either way, i really couldn't give a flying **** to be perfectly honest.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP