Mayweather vs Bradley

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jaestix1
    Banned
    • Aug 2009
    • 1735
    • 92
    • 2
    • 1,882

    #1

    Mayweather vs Bradley

    is this an acceptable fight? or would ya'll trash this fight?
  • sicko
    The Truth Hurts
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2010
    • 34211
    • 2,594
    • 839
    • 151,307

    #2
    YES...why wouldn't it be? Much better then fighting Robert Guerrero or even Canelo (even though Canelo fight would be much bigger of course)...but I think Bradley would be TOUGHER to deal with as far as the action in the ring

    Comment

    • -PBP-
      32 Time World Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2012
      • 24107
      • 836
      • 635
      • 34,297

      #3
      Hell yeah its acceptable.

      Comment

      • 1sballotHOF
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Nov 2012
        • 439
        • 21
        • 2
        • 6,511

        #4
        Garbage fight imo. He's got the craft to make it some what interesting, but the dude lost all his athleticism at 147.

        NOT ACCEPTABLE.

        Comment

        • ElBossHogg™
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2012
          • 4940
          • 260
          • 197
          • 5,720

          #5
          I rather Mayweather fight Canelo but bradley aint a bad tune up fight for mayweather before he faces Canelo

          Comment

          • jaestix1
            Banned
            • Aug 2009
            • 1735
            • 92
            • 2
            • 1,882

            #6
            Originally posted by 1sballotHOF
            Garbage fight imo. He's got the craft to make it some what interesting, but the dude lost all his athleticism at 147.

            NOT ACCEPTABLE.
            you forget the fact that at 147, bradley was fighting pac on two bad ankles and was more than competitive with pac especially in the championship rounds.

            Comment

            • 1sballotHOF
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Nov 2012
              • 439
              • 21
              • 2
              • 6,511

              #7
              Originally posted by jaestix1
              you forget the fact that at 147, bradley was fighting pac on two bad ankles and was more than competitive with pac especially in the championship rounds.
              I didn't forget the fact that Bradley is an easy fight for Floyd. Hindsight is 20/20, but it doesn't change the fact that we already saw the Pacquiao fight. He doesn't belong in their with Floyd.

              What, because he has a belt, and "won", one of the most controversial fights in recent times, that makes it an acceptable fight?

              I don't even think fans would accept it. They'd just say, "He's the dude that robbed Pacquiao!" "Come on Floyd, why you fightin this bum!?"
              Last edited by 1sballotHOF; 11-17-2012, 05:37 PM.

              Comment

              • 1sballotHOF
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Nov 2012
                • 439
                • 21
                • 2
                • 6,511

                #8
                I'm sorry, but I want a so called ATG to challenge himself. People saying it's a better fight than Canelo are out of their minds. Not only is Canelo more challenging, but a bigger draw as well.

                Comment

                • Larry the boss
                  EDUCATED
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 90798
                  • 6,419
                  • 4,473
                  • 2,500,480

                  #9
                  Originally posted by 1sballotHOF
                  Garbage fight imo. He's got the craft to make it some what interesting, but the dude lost all his athleticism at 147.

                  NOT ACCEPTABLE.
                  Originally posted by 1sballotHOF
                  I didn't forget the fact that Bradley is an easy fight for Floyd. Hindsight is 20/20, but it doesn't change the fact that we already saw the Pacquiao fight. He doesn't belong in their with Floyd.

                  What, because he has a belt, and "won", one of the most controversial fights in recent times, that makes it an acceptable fight?

                  I don't even think fans would accept it. They'd just say, "He's the dude that robbed Pacquiao!" "Come on Floyd, why you fightin this bum!?"
                  so Bradley an undefeated 2 division champion top p4p fighter and current WBO ww champion isnt good enough for Floyd???damn he is held at high standards

                  Comment

                  • Larry the boss
                    EDUCATED
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 90798
                    • 6,419
                    • 4,473
                    • 2,500,480

                    #10
                    Originally posted by 1sballotHOF
                    I'm sorry, but I want a so called ATG to challenge himself. People saying it's a better fight than Canelo are out of their minds. Not only is Canelo more challenging, but a bigger draw as well.
                    But Bradley was a good fight for Manny but not Floyd?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP