Where should the following two fights take place? US or UK

[Cállate!]

Broner vs Burns

Alexander vs Brook

Broner has some fans but he doesn't have the drawing power to fill up an arena like Burns does. For gate reasons alone this fight should be in the UK imo.

Alexander-Brook is a fight that I think should take place in the UK but won't. Alexander literally has no drawing power and it'd be a travesty to see this fight in the US with Devon's 25 screaming family mem- I mean fans. He's known for getting hometown decisions too.

You can vote for both so please choose where you think the fight should take place for both fights, and your reasoning.

[fish262]

Depends on what undercards they can put together IMO

[Cállate!]

Depends on what undercards they can put together IMO

true forgot about that

[gmc_rfc_06]

Both fights would be FAR bigger in the UK.

However, that;s not how locations are decided. Financially and fan interest wise though, they would be better served in the UK. Both fights would sell out arenas, whereas in the US, both would be minor events.

[Earl-Hickey]

Let both champs fight at home, to be fair

both would do bigger business in the UK however

[SpeedKillz]

champs should fight at home. fights would make money in both US and UK...

[Walt Liquor]

devon sells out in st louis so I don't see why brook would be so much more lucrative...

[Ray*]

I think the fight should happen where the exposure is not just the money, For me I would like the Burns/Broner fight to happen in America because that fight would generate more money and exposure in Vegas.

The Alexander/Brook fight would generate more money in the UK and the exposure would be good for both fighters especially for Alexander who can make a few fans over here if he fights the right way and wins the fight.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

America for both.............

[Weebler I]

Champions should fight at home.

UK produces the far better fight atmosphere though.