Comments Thread For: Enzo Calzaghe: Carl Froch is Not a Great Fighter

[Shameful]

He's not a great boxer but he IS a great fighter.

He is and will be very well respected in years to come by all, Joe Calzaghe will not!!

[Joe2608]

His resume is greater than Calzaghe's already. The amount of tough opponents he's been in with is ridiculous, mainly thanks to the super six tournament. Only problem with Froch is, although he's got a good resume, he's also lost convincingly to the 2 best fighters on that resume Ward and Kessler. He really needs to rematch and beat Kessler to be able to make the claim that he's a better fighter than Calzaghe.

Obviously Calzaghe has a padded record but he was a master at adapting in the ring and he was in some tough fights himself. There's no doubting he was a decent fighter and he beat everyone in front of him.

[gmc_rfc_06]

His resume is greater than Calzaghe's already. The amount of tough opponents he's been in with is ridiculous, mainly thanks to the super six tournament. Only problem with Froch is, although he's got a good resume, he's also lost convincingly to the 2 best fighters on that resume Ward and Kessler. He really needs to rematch and beat Kessler to be able to make the claim that he's a better fighter than Calzaghe.

Obviously Calzaghe has a padded record but he was a master at adapting in the ring and he was in some tough fights himself. There's no doubting he was a decent fighter and he beat everyone in front of him.

The Kessler fight was a very 50/;50 fight IMO.

I think that W was going to whoever had the home advantage. I believe Froch would have got the verdict in the UK, like Kessler got it in Denmark.

[ShoulderRoll]

calzaghe has a win over jones and hopkins

for life

Rustico Torrecampo has a win over Pacquiao. For life.