what was/is more effective in taking away from ppv numbers?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vasyl’s dad
    He said no rematch
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 23510
    • 1,120
    • 1,945
    • 50,072

    #1

    what was/is more effective in taking away from ppv numbers?

    Illegal boxes such as the ones from the 90s, or streams?
  • -Kev-
    this is boxing
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 39960
    • 5,045
    • 1,449
    • 234,543

    #2
    They are almost the same. Every one has internet access nowadays. Not everybody had the illegal box back then, a lot of people were afraid to have them. Every one has access to illegal streams, millions of people.

    I'd still say they're the same though. Chavez Jr-Martinez 500k now, would have been 500k in the 90s with illegal boxes, hell I think it would have been actually been a bit more. I'd say 700-800k. Boxing was more popular back then. You know how many people stream Chavez-Martinez? I'd take a guess that it would have been around 1.5Million PPVs if every one bought the fight in the US.

    Comment

    • Vasyl’s dad
      He said no rematch
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 23510
      • 1,120
      • 1,945
      • 50,072

      #3
      Originally posted by -Kev-
      They are almost the same. Every one has internet access nowadays. Not everybody had the illegal box back then, a lot of people were afraid to have them. Every one has access to illegal streams, millions of people.

      I'd still say they're the same though. Chavez Jr-Martinez 500k now, would have been 500k in the 90s with illegal boxes, hell I think it would have been actually been a bit more. I'd say 700-800k. Boxing was more popular back then. You know how many people stream Chavez-Martinez? I'd take a guess that it would have been around 1.5Million PPVs if every one bought the fight in the US.
      Many people have net access but very few know what a stream is. The average user has no clue what a stream is. The sports fanatic, yea. But a casual fan, nah.

      Comment

      • -Kev-
        this is boxing
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2006
        • 39960
        • 5,045
        • 1,449
        • 234,543

        #4
        Even people who are technology challenged[usually older people] know that they can watch events on the internet.

        Comment

        • Vasyl’s dad
          He said no rematch
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 23510
          • 1,120
          • 1,945
          • 50,072

          #5
          Originally posted by -Kev-
          Even people who are technology challenged[usually older people] know that they can watch events on the internet.
          Doesn't mean they know what a stream is though. That's the difference. Plus, with streams, the quality is usually **** compared to what you got with an illegal box. The box had the same exact quality as the actual paid channel. Stream, far from it, especially with a large event fight.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP