Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao: I Believe Mayweather is Avoiding Me

[BoxingGenius27]

Bradley won and Arum made it happen. Case closed. In the beginning I said Bradley would win and in the end I said Bradley would win. Jack Ass.

Did you not say Bradley would win but get robbed, meaning that Pac would officially win on the cards/decision, but Bradley would be the moral victor (i.e Pac-JMM III)?

Tell us you didn't say that?

[bojangles1987]

Come on man. Are you seriously telling me this? Arum made sure Bradley won period. Pac got robbed. If Arum is making sure Bradley wins then what do you call that?

That's not what you predicted though, and earlier in the post you said Bradley would maybe get robbed. Considering we can all read the post you are posting multiple times, I can't believe you are arguing otherwise. Making one section bigger and a different color doesn't mean we can't read everything else.

[GRUSTLER]

Did you not say Bradley would win but get robbed, meaning that Pac would officially win on the cards/decision, but Bradley would be the moral victor (i.e Pac-JMM III)?

Tell us you didn't say that?

I said that, if it went to the cards that Bradley could get robbed but if Arum learned from his last mistake with JMM, then he would let the fight go as is, if Bradley indeed earned the win. That was the beginning of my post and towards and at the end I said that it may be worth more to Arum if Bradley won being that he is undefeated and that's what happened. I never said that Manny Pacquiao would win. Did I?

[BoxingGenius27]

I said that, if it went to the cards that Bradley could get robbed but if Arum learned from his last mistake with JMM, then he would let the fight go as is, if Bradley indeed earned the win. That was the beginning of my post and towards and at the end I said that it may be worth more to Arum if Bradley won being that he is undefeated and that's what happened. I never said that Manny Pacquiao would win. Did I?

Yes, you said Pac would win via robbery lol Everyone see's it, why are you continuing to embarrassyourself.

Anyway, your now implying that Arum robbed Pac for Bradley. So why did you say that Arum threw Bradley under the bus?

How can Arum supposedly "Rob Pac" and "Throw Bradley under the bus", his future star at the same time?

at you going in circles.

[GRUSTLER]

That's not what you predicted though, and earlier in the post you said Bradley would maybe get robbed. Considering we can all read the post you are posting multiple times, I can't believe you are arguing otherwise. Making one section bigger and a different color doesn't mean we can't read everything else.

In every paragraph there is a beginning, a middle and an end. In the beginning I said there would be a chance Bradley could get robbed if it went to the cards but never emphasized that it would be in fact so. Did I? I went on to say that it would be best for Arum to keep it fair due to repercussions of his last fight with JMM. Correct? Then I went on to explain different scenarios for both fighters stylistically that Bradley needed to do like avoid going toe to toe with Pacquiao which he did for majority of the fight because look at what happened to his feet. He was moving and shaking. Right? The conclusion of my post said that Arum may want Bradley to win for his best interest business wise and that is exactly what happened. Did it not? Not once in that post did I predict Manny Pacquiao would definitely walk away with the win. I predicted that Arum would have his hand in it by letting Bradley win and he did. How is this so hard to understand and being debated?

[BoxingGenius27]

In every paragraph there is a beginning, a middle and an end. In the beginning I said there would be a chance Bradley could get robbed if it went to the cards but never emphasized that it would be in fact so. Did I? I went on to say that it would be best for Arum to keep it fair due to repercussions of his last fight with JMM. Correct? Then I went on to explain different scenarios for both fighters stylistically that Bradley needed to do like avoid going toe to toe with Pacquiao which he did for majority of the fight because look at what happened to his feet. He was moving and shaking. Right? The conclusion of my post said that Arum may want Bradley to win for his best interest business wise and that is exactly what happened. Did it not? Not once in that post did I predict Manny Pacquiao would definitely walk away with the win. I predicted that Arum would have his hand in it by letting Bradley win and he did. How is this so hard to understand and being debated?

LMAO Sure, RUSTY, no one believes that bull**** you're trying to feed right now because that's not what you said, at all.

Anyway, don't avoid the question. How can Arum Rob Pac for Bradley, but throw Bradley under the bus at the same time?

Doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

[bojangles1987]

In every paragraph there is a beginning, a middle and an end. In the beginning I said there would be a chance Bradley could get robbed if it went to the cards but never emphasized that it would be in fact so. Did I? I went on to say that it would be best for Arum to keep it fair due to repercussions of his last fight with JMM. Correct? Then I went on to explain different scenarios for both fighters stylistically that Bradley needed to do like avoid going toe to toe with Pacquiao which he did for majority of the fight because look at what happened to his feet. He was moving and shaking. Right? The conclusion of my post said that Arum may want Bradley to win for his best interest business wise and that is exactly what happened. Did it not? Not once in that post did I predict Manny Pacquiao would definitely walk away with the win. I predicted that Arum would have his hand in it by letting Bradley win and he did. How is this so hard to understand and being debated?

That's not what that post said. At all. You never said a word of Bob Arum rigging the scores for Bradley. The only mention of a robbery was for Pac, not against him. That highlighted part at the end does not read as "Arum will rob Pac."

Unless you are trying to tell us you predicted both fighters might get robbed. Which would be ****** to think you should get credit for predicting.

[GRUSTLER]

Yes, you said Pac would win via robbery lol Everyone see's it, why are you continuing to embarrassyourself.

Anyway, your now implying that Arum robbed Pac for Bradley. So why did you say that Arum threw Bradley under the bus?

How can Arum supposedly "Rob Pac" and "Throw Bradley under the bus", his future star at the same time?

at you going in circles.

You are a JACK ASS that needs to go back to school and take reading comprehension classes. Also, that is EXACTLY what Arum did to Pac and Bradley. Don't you agree that Pac got robbed? Where's Bradley at now?
Didn't Arum say Bradley's people said Bradley lost? Man, you are a dumb ass.
Arum plan for a rematch back fired because the fight wasn't even close. Arum didn't predict the fight turning out like that.

I feel like Bradley can win this fight because of his youth, stamina, condition, movement, pressure and skill set. Manny is dominate when his opponents are slower, fight with their hands down and stands right in front of Pac. I want to say Bradley by UD but if it goes 12th then for sure the robbery may go down but if Arum is smart. He will let this one play out because it will hurt Pac more than help him ESPECIALLY after the JMM fight. Pac damage is done by accumulation so if Bradley can take away Pac's speed, make him punch off balance, miss and pay then I could see Bradley taking this fight easy BUT if he thinks he is going to maul over Pac without thinking his way in then Manny is going to punish him and put him out. Pacquiao weakness are technical boxers. Tough fight to call but I'm going to jump out of the window and take all the heat from the Pacquiao fans and say Timothy Bradley UD. I also feel like Pac is on his way out and Bradley is fresh and undefeated so Bob Arum may be making way for the future and having an undefeated fighter in his stable will probably be worth more in the future. Can't wait for the fight!

I hate using this word but you are ******.

[BoxingGenius27]

You are a JACK ASS that needs to go back to school and take reading comprehension classes. Also, that is EXACTLY what Arum did to Pac and Bradley. Don't you agree that Pac got robbed? Where's Bradley at now?
Didn't Arum say Bradley's people said Bradley lost? Man, you are a dumb ass.
Arum plan for a rematch back fired because the fight wasn't even close. Arum didn't predict the fight turning out like that.



I hate using this word but you are ******.

Someone please explain what the fcuk this guy is talking about?

Am I the only one lost here?

He's agreeing that Pac got robbed, but in his prediction he said that Bradley will get robbed? WTF is going on here?

And why the fcuk does he keep using these big fonts and colored text?

[GRUSTLER]

That's not what that post said. At all. You never said a word of Bob Arum rigging the scores for Bradley. The only mention of a robbery was for Pac, not against him. That highlighted part at the end does not read as "Arum will rob Pac."

Unless you are trying to tell us you predicted both fighters might get robbed. Which would be ****** to think you should get credit for predicting.

So you consider Bradley winning that fight Arum not robbing Pacquiao? Do I have to say if Bradley wins then that means Pacquiao got robbed? Seriously? If Arum is making sure Bradley wins no matter what. Would not that be a robbery? Come on man. I predicted Bradley would win bottom line.