Comments Thread For: Team Guerrero: We Had a Deal, Tim Bradley Pulled Out

[FloydvsPac]

so he should have said be Mexican and say i won? Cause i see that you havent touched the fact that when Pac said be a fillipino and pretty much say he won that that was alright.

Anyway Bradley messed up by signing with TR. They have no one left in the stable. 140-147 fights being signed around him and he is the odd man out. Hope that Pac pay was good enough for this.

It's no different than when Floyd told the public to root for him over Pacquiao because he's an american. Asking for nationalism may sound desperate. But for JMM to claim robbery from the Pacquiao fights is just irrational and arrogant.

[FloydvsPac]

They got fed up with him because he refused to fight Peterson. HBO loves to play match-maker and Bradley wasn't having it. About Ghost/Bradley, IDK what's up with that situation. All I'm saying is that I don't believe either party. My rule is to only believe what the fighters say, not their promoters/managers. Bradley said he doesn't want to fight Peterson again, no reasoning or speculation needed. I'm glad he's going this route cuz I'm sick of the boxer being at the bottom of the hierarchy.

If you believe what the fighters say then why don't you believe Guerrero? He specifically said, there was a DEAL IN PLACE and Bradley backed out. Having a deal in place means that Guerrero, Golden Boy, Top Rank and HBO agreed to the terms.

If this was truly Top Rank's fault, then Guerrero could've easily said that Bradley AND Top Rank backed out. Guerrero has no allegiance to Top Rank. Golden Boy would've had no problems with Guerrero throwing TR under the bus with Bradley. But he specifically ONLY said Bradley, bro.

[Money_May]

yup, 6 million in 2 fights.....horrible business decision

6 million in 21 months. He could have earned more with shaw in that time.

[kiaba360]

If you believe what the fighters say then why don't you believe Guerrero? He specifically said, there was a DEAL IN PLACE and Bradley backed out. Having a deal in place means that Guerrero, Golden Boy, Top Rank and HBO agreed to the terms.

If this was truly Top Rank's fault, then Guerrero could've easily said that Bradley AND Top Rank backed out. Guerrero has no allegiance to Top Rank. Golden Boy would've had no problems with Guerrero throwing TR under the bus with Bradley. But he specifically ONLY said Bradley, bro.

You're right, but until Bradley has spoken on why it fell through (or if he ever received a deal or contract), then it's up in the air. I'm not denouncing what Ghost said, but since TR/GBP already have a bad history, I can help but feel that their strained relationship had something to do with the fight falling through. Then when you have Berto/Haymon waiting in the wings for a fight, the situation gets a bit more complicated. We will see happens once Bradley tells his side, what kinds of conclusions are drawn based on his word.

[Fetta]

It's no different than when Floyd told the public to root for him over Pacquiao because he's an american. Asking for nationalism may sound desperate. But for JMM to claim robbery from the Pacquiao fights is just irrational and arrogant.

I dont care what floyd said but shouldnt asking for nationalism also considered to be irrational and arrogant? And didnt team Pac say that they were "robbed" against Bradley?

[FloydvsPac]

I dont care what floyd said but shouldnt asking for nationalism also considered to be irrational and arrogant? And didnt team Pac say that they were "robbed" against Bradley?

If you have a problem with that, then this debate is over. Everyone in the media said Pacquiao was robbed, even the Mayweathers. Later, bro.

[Fetta]

If you have a problem with that, then this debate is over. Everyone in the media said Pacquiao was robbed, even the Mayweathers. Later, bro.

Your biased view just showed itself so yes please go. And for your info a MAJORITY of fans, media, boxers, former boxers, and trainers all said JMM was ROBBED but since hes not Pac its not alright for you.

[Fetta]

If you have a problem with that, then this debate is over. Everyone in the media said Pacquiao was robbed, even the Mayweathers. Later, bro.

Didnt you state that no respectable media person would use the word robbed but then you post that they all said he was ROBBED. so which is it in your biased view?

[puga]

why do these guys always talk like huerrero is some beast that everyone is scared of ..f0cker is a weakling and a quitter..

[FloydvsPac]

You're right, but until Bradley has spoken on why it fell through (or if he ever received a deal or contract), then it's up in the air. I'm not denouncing what Ghost said, but since TR/GBP already have a bad history, I can help but feel that their strained relationship had something to do with the fight falling through. Then when you have Berto/Haymon waiting in the wings for a fight, the situation gets a bit more complicated. We will see happens once Bradley tells his side, what kinds of conclusions are drawn based on his word.

I think by Bradley denouncing the Peterson rematch and saying he'll just wait for Pacquiao says it all. I don't think he wanted to fight Guerrero in the first place. If Guerrero is right about the deal being in place and ready to sign, then Bradley made the decision alone at the end of the day. Bradley and his manager can't get their stories straight. Bradley is not looking good at this point. He recently even hired a top lawyer. Then a week later, that same lawyer lost a court case where Cotto has to now pay millions to his ex-trainer. Bradley can't seem to catch a break.