1. Pongsaklek Wonjongkam - Paper champ who keeps backing out of an Arce fight. Fights only in his country Thailand most of the time.
2. Juan Manuel Marquez - Defended title against Salido who? and Polo who?, when a bunch of other fights can be made for him...named Pacman, Morales, Barrera, Injin Chi, Scott etc.
And now will fight Chris who? just so he can get his precious belt back.
3. All the Heavyweights
The undeserving ones are the ones that don't defend their titles against tough oppositions(well maybe mandatories:still sucks). The ones that fight once a year. Or those who was given belts fo weak reasons.
1. Chris Byrd IBF Champion is undeserving in ma opinion.
2. Vitali Klitschko when he held his WBC belt is undeserving.
3. Ricardo Mayorga holds a WBC title and definitely don't
deserve it.
I agree about Mayorga. The other two picked up vacant belts against viable opponents.
Markus Beyer Won his title on a questionable decision, held it on dubious officiating and then lost it to a mediocre fighter. The only impressive title result on his resume is the MD against Danny Green.
Ricardo Mayorga won his title after only having one fight at superwelter and against a guy who had never beaten a top-flight fighter and wasn't ranked in the Ring's top ten.
Hasim Rahman was lucky not to have to fight Klitschko. I don't mean that he would have been beaten. I have no idea what the result would have been. But he got his title in a lackluster showing against a lower-echelon top-ten guy.
I like Arthur Abraham, but I don't think he should be a titlist. The stripping of Taylor's title was bull****.
Alejandro Garcia never had to rematch against the only guy to beat him.
what do u guys think about ruiz being an undeserving champion?
he lost to toney and because he tested positive for steroids they gave it back to him. when it has been proven that the meds toney took for his injury would give him the positive test.
i would just like your guys opinions because i am undecided.
Comment