I agree Cotto won't KO Trout (delusional Cottards) but are you seriously implying that Trout will get robbed? Like actually saying that Trout will BEAT Cotto? Because if you say "controversial" you're implying a "robbery" and that would mean that Trout really did beat Cotto.
Cotto vs Trout who's going to win this fight?
Collapse
-
it will be a close fight is what I was implying, and people here will be split on who the real winner wasComment
-
You mean the same way Cotto was CLEARLY dominating Clottey until the headbutt that caused the massive cut over Cotto's eye?
That's the only reason it went the distance.
I'll give you 2:1 to all your points. I got Miguel.Comment
-
We dont know that, Trout may be packing glass. Cotto can stop him, TKO or left to they body.I agree Cotto won't KO Trout (delusional Cottards) but are you seriously implying that Trout will get robbed? Like actually saying that Trout will BEAT Cotto? Because if you say "controversial" you're implying a "robbery" and that would mean that Trout really did beat Cotto.
Of Trout's last 5-6 victories, his opponest have like 20 losses! What the hell? He has not faced anyone of the caliber of Miguel.Comment
-
Trout should beat him. Younger, Bigger, Hungrier...but that lazy jab of his is going to do him in. I have a hard time picking Cotto to KO or TKO a natural 154 LB fighter but Trout just doesn't impress me, too many flaws. I think Diaz gameplans accordingly and Cotto gets him outta there. But if Trout wins I'm good with that, he deserves to win for risking his belt by taking on Cotto in NYC.Comment
-
cotto will spark'emI agree Cotto won't KO Trout (delusional Cottards) but are you seriously implying that Trout will get robbed? Like actually saying that Trout will BEAT Cotto? Because if you say "controversial" you're implying a "robbery" and that would mean that Trout really did beat Cotto.Comment
-
Comment