How do you feel about boxing returning to Network TV(NBC)?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Evil Abed
    The Darkest Timeline...
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 21964
    • 979
    • 1,320
    • 30,552

    #41
    So we got off subject a bit.

    Comment

    • -Kev-
      this is boxing
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 39914
      • 5,025
      • 1,447
      • 234,543

      #42
      NBC will be a good network for prospects and fighters who are in a rebuilding stage.

      Comment

      • paulf
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 23699
        • 3,324
        • 2,093
        • 1,052,140

        #43
        Originally posted by croz
        What are you trying to say exactly? The Wire had **** ratings on HBO, especially for one of their major shows. The Sopranos had great ratings by HBO standards but it was still largely cut off from a big audience. I think the final episode managed a high of around 5 million on HBO. Had that been on a network like CBS you could be talking more than 20 million viewers.

        A good example of how this work is that tennis when on HBO manages around 200k to 600k viewers. Tennis when it's on network TV in the US has managed around 6 million.
        What am I trying to say? I'm saying that, despite having a much smaller subscriber base than network TV, the above shows are incredibly popular and known very very well by the general public. Meanwhile, Boxing, which takes place on the same network as these incredibly well known shows, is all but a ghost to average Americans.

        Thanks for supporting my point even more.

        Comment

        • Evil Abed
          The Darkest Timeline...
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 21964
          • 979
          • 1,320
          • 30,552

          #44
          Originally posted by -Kev-
          NBC will be a good network for prospects and fighters who are in a rebuilding stage.
          Adamek and Cunningham are neither of those things.

          Comment

          • macman
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Nov 2006
            • 801
            • 43
            • 0
            • 9,050

            #45
            A lot of it depends how well they do their coverage, but from what I've seen they're doing an excellent job, gearing it towards the 'blue-collar' audience who are not going to fork out $40 for a PPV, but still appreciate a good boxing 'fight'.

            The kind of casual fan that these days will check out your icehockey & NFL games if it looks like being a good match, follow how their local team are doing & have their favourite players, without necessarily really following the sport.
            Or the people who used to be the mainstay of boxing audiences in the 50's & 70's but overpriced PPV's & ticket sales drove them away.

            NBC are featuring some good solid contender matchups, building up fighters with an exciting style, as well as featuring some local fighters that people will tune back into to find out how they are doing.

            ESPN mostly does a great job, but it's focused more on the hardcore fan. NBC is a welcome addition to the US boxing lineup in bringing back the blue-collar casual fan, while serving up some really good fights.

            Comment

            • Mule Deer
              Banned
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Oct 2012
              • 83
              • 4
              • 2
              • 116

              #46
              I love it, but these guys are unknowns. Put a decent name on so we can get a true judge of what the numbers could pull. This will just be a ratings disaster and we will see boxing take a step back from getting onto a network.

              Comment

              • The Hammer
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 50797
                • 3,416
                • 8,704
                • 58,851

                #47
                Cunningham-Adamek is better than 90% of the fight on HBO this month.

                Props to NBC for choosing a good matchup to televise.

                Comment

                • Pez
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2010
                  • 1563
                  • 41
                  • 44
                  • 7,937

                  #48
                  if they're gonna put boxing on one of the major networks for free, they should make sure it's a fan friendly fight. otherwise, i think it's just going to hurt the sport. they should be putting on entertaining fighters like rios and maidana or super talented ones that dominate like gamboa. just putting on a known fighter like adamek is not going to help boost the sport's popularity.

                  Comment

                  • kiaba360
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 18959
                    • 2,251
                    • 3,425
                    • 45,265

                    #49
                    If not for NBC, I wouldn't know much of Gabriel Rosado. Adamek has also been a notable name being featured on the network. Boxing needs more outlets.

                    Comment

                    • Chups
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2004
                      • 18402
                      • 1,835
                      • 1,281
                      • 52,879

                      #50
                      WTF? Why was CHOWWOKKA banned?


                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP