Tweet
If you seriously cannot see a huge difference in the two, then you're blind. Fight would've played out completely differently and Fury would've got his second loss that night.
@Joe:
Being a world class fighter doesn't mean you're known by the rest of the world class fighters or more fans, it's what you've proven. Fury has beaten Maddalone, someone who holds no stake in the heavyweight division. He's not even a gatekeeper, let alone a contender - so how does Fury earn the right to be called ' world class '?
Maddalone, like Butler, is an American journeyman. You could say Fury has the better win but certainly not a level above. I can kind of see why you think so though when you keep mentioning how Fury has fought outside of England and how he's better promoted - yet again, neither indicate how good a fighter is.
@Joe:
Being a world class fighter doesn't mean you're known by the rest of the world class fighters or more fans, it's what you've proven. Fury has beaten Maddalone, someone who holds no stake in the heavyweight division. He's not even a gatekeeper, let alone a contender - so how does Fury earn the right to be called ' world class '?
Maddalone, like Butler, is an American journeyman. You could say Fury has the better win but certainly not a level above. I can kind of see why you think so though when you keep mentioning how Fury has fought outside of England and how he's better promoted - yet again, neither indicate how good a fighter is.
Comment