Why was Larry Holmes' body so sloppy?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • butterfly1964
    The HW Sugar Ray!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2005
    • 10615
    • 374
    • 233
    • 23,822

    #21
    Originally posted by mystyal2k5
    it really didnt matter cause look what he did in history. plus ali and frazier didnt have an magnificient body neither and look at what they turned out to be. so ppl dont need the looks i guess
    are you friggin' seroius? arguably the best proportionally built boxing body in history mystyal2k5, was muhammad ali in his prime, or cassius clay. he had a massive back that ripped and flexed and contracted every time he bounced around in the ring (just watch ali-mildenburger), big t****zeous muscles, ripped forearms, deltoids and biceps, strong ripped legs, the strongest legs in history, and abs and a midsection of steel (no one could punish ali's body, even in his prime, watch the chuvalo and liston fights) watch all his fights in the 60s, and a large amount of his fight even in the 70s! his body was extremely cut and trim!


    yeah, real flabby!

    also, look at my avatar. enough said!

    Comment

    • bassing68
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Oct 2005
      • 191
      • 23
      • 6
      • 6,514

      #22
      Originally posted by Holmes
      You dont need an athletic/muscular body to be a good boxer. being ripped does not guarantee KO power.

      First this is absoutely true; which is why the phrase don't judge a book by it's cover is so true.

      Second, I love the smurf gettin some nips. That's awesome.

      Comment

      • hollister
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2004
        • 2442
        • 68
        • 2
        • 10,083

        #23
        Holmes was pretty trim when he fought Norton, and also when he fought Cooney (I simply haven't seen that many of his fights), why not target Jess Willard, he didn't look that great. Holmes just didn't have quite the difference between his shoulders and his hips that say Tyson had, that's all.

        Comment

        • Da Iceman
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2005
          • 5042
          • 133
          • 128
          • 10,394

          #24
          because he didnt understand the concept of a situp , you could say the same about dempsey he had *******.

          Comment

          • ROSEWOOD
            THE SOUTH STILL HOLDIN
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2006
            • 4683
            • 209
            • 195
            • 12,093

            #25
            Originally posted by jack_the_rippuh
            Even when he was young. He had a nasty looking body.
            He didn't have an intimidating looking body.
            He had an ugly looking body, man.
            He was fat and sloppy.

            Why didn't he work harder to get a nicer looking body before fight time?
            that didnt stop him from whippin fools...that body looks **** dont got nothing to do with you winning and losing fights...

            Comment

            • Mistadobalina
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jan 2006
              • 918
              • 81
              • 2
              • 7,748

              #26
              what bothered me is the fact that holmes had a very womanly physique.

              this is something that him being in shape wouldn't have solved...his hip bones were just wider than his shoulders. very strange...

              Comment

              • Bea5T
                Undisputed Champion
                • Sep 2007
                • 1718
                • 61
                • 16
                • 7,983

                #27
                holmes at one point wasnt that bad

                Comment

                • Pico Hollywood
                  ars longa vita brevis
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 9354
                  • 463
                  • 368
                  • 17,724

                  #28
                  @ this thread

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP