Year 2000/24-0 Floyd vs. Broner now (also 24-0)

**Mato o Muero** · 10-09-2012, 10:26 AM

Broner is not even close to Floyd's level. Floyd would toy with this dude.

**-DSG-** · 10-09-2012, 10:27 AM

Originally posted by Derranged

Why not.. Since Floyd and Broner get praised and hated on by the same people for the most part, since Broner idolizes and emulates Floyd, etc.. The hell with it.

I can picture Floyd beating on this poor kid like he did against Angel Manfredy. Not to say Broner and Manfredy are anything alike, and maybe wouldn't be over that fast, but back at 130, when Floyd smelled blood he went for the kill rather than just always opting to cruise to a decision. Floyd rips his head off, me thinks.

What say you? Remember now, both at 130 and both at 24-0.

Floyd decision I don't think anybody beats Floyd at 130

**B.U.R.N.E.R** · 10-09-2012, 10:27 AM

Fight wouldnt even get sanctioned. Complete mis match. Were talking about the greatest and most talented 130 pounder ever.

Broner gets creamed.

**UTEP** · 10-09-2012, 10:49 AM

Come on........ Floyd didn't win a 'vacant' belt against a bum like Broner did. Floyd actually beat the reigning champion who is in the Hall of Fame right now, and that was when Floyd was 17-0 the next 7 defences were against #1 contenders and fighter's that were ranked in the top 5. Floyd didn't act like he was God's gift to boxing either like Broner does right now. Floyd didn't start acting like that until he had the resume to back it up.

**shade darkar** · 10-09-2012, 11:02 AM

id go for the originator, not the copy cat.

**Derranged** · 10-09-2012, 11:02 AM

I wonder if Broner read this would it kick some sense into him?

Answer: no

**285Kid** · 10-09-2012, 11:51 AM

Floyd wins , Broner wins one round tho

**THE REED** · 10-09-2012, 11:52 AM

The IQ levels aren't even on the same stratosphere.

**Pretty Boy Greg** · 10-09-2012, 11:58 AM

no one beats floyd at 130... toooooooooo fast!!!

Year 2000/24-0 Floyd vs. Broner now (also 24-0)