Comments Thread For: Roach: Bradley Sells No Tickets, No Money in a Rematch

[mexiking]

I love how fighting a top ten undefeated fighter with a good resume is taking "the easy road". SMH.

No, I always knew bradley was a good fighter! But he's not known for his KO power. They thought pacq would overwhelm him with his power, but his power isnt there anymore! That to me is the easy road! There were plenty of options that could have drawn higher number!

[Starz20]

Two new judges, Roach? How about all three? Even the one judge who had Pacquiao winning, had it by too close a margin. Plus, THAT judge was Jerry Roth, the same Jerry Roth who scored 116-112 in the Rios/Abril. If Pacquiao/Bradley II does happen, all three judges need to be new, credible, YOUNGER judges.

Still irritates me Bradley is even on the list of future opponents considering Pacquiao already convincingly BEAT HIM. The dude has very few fights left, pisses me off I gotta see one of those wasted on an opponent he already beat. If I'm Pacquiao, it's Floyd or nothing. Fight Floyd first before you guys get any older.

Thank you, this was a very good post and I am a fan of boxing first and you nailed it right on the head. Why waste fights on rematches when you can fight newer fresher fighters. But I agree fans want to see something new.

[Osirus022]

Lol its HILARIOUS that Roach is saying all they need is to get TWO new judges for the Bradley fight, BUT, when Marquez said he wanted other judges and NOT from Vegas, Pac's team turned him down SMH

[Rk16]

Pacquiao and his team come out with so many ******ed comments
Any fighter with balls avenges a loss,be it controversial or not!Cant believe fans don't want a rematch cos they think Pacquiao won the first.Floyd beat Castillo but rematched him because people thought he lost.If he chose not to could you imagine the **** people would be saying about Floyd avoiding Castillo!
Marquez deserved an immediate rematch after last years robbery but didn't get it.The reason he got it now is because the Pacquiao Bradley rematch will be next and they can keep avoiding the fight with Floyd

[mexiking]

Lol its HILARIOUS that Roach is saying all they need is to get TWO new judges for the Bradley fight, BUT, when Marquez said he wanted other judges and NOT from Vegas, Pac's team turned him down SMH

Lol.... They need all the help he can get.

[Rk16]

Thank you, this was a very good post and I am a fan of boxing first and you nailed it right on the head. Why waste fights on rematches when you can fight newer fresher fighters. But I agree fans want to see something new.

How is fighting Marquez a newer fresher fighter?

[JDezi4]

So, now that Bradley has more world-wide notoriety as the guy that robbed Pacquiao... He's not worth a rematch

But when he was a total unknown outside of hardcore boxing fans, he was such a great choice




And funniest think about this is that they know Bradley's gonna be Pac's next opponent... It'll go from "Bradley isn't worth it" to "I must get my revenge >("

[sargo]

They better not fight Bradley next.

[Fetta]

They better not fight Bradley next.

If JMM gets robbed again and Bradley wins his fight then yes they will fight again in April

[KING MEAT]

If there is no money in it then why did they fight him the first time? There was a compelling reason to face Bradley before but there isn't one now?

If he isnt a good draw for tickets,Then why the hell did he fight him in the 1st place?

bob arum............