Your problem is you don't have a response for what I say so you just change the topic completely or you deliberately misinterpret what I say in order to make a comeback. Then you expect me to answer your points which are based on a false premise. Sorry buds, but that's not how it works. You still haven't been able to admit that you're against consensual ******, that's how far you'll go to keep up your false arguments.
I don't care what f@gs do behind closed doors, if they kept it to themselves no one would give a sh_t. I never condemned anyone for anything, I just stated facts. If humans stopped procreating humanity would cease to exist. Therefore it logically follows that men and women were not intended to mate with their own sex because it would lead to the end of their species. You then start talking about car salesmen and blacksmiths cause you can't refute that point so you change the argument. And I never brought religion into this, not once, so I'm not sure why you keep bringing it up, thinking I'll be insulted by religious jokes. You don't need religion to understand why it's wrong, common sense will do for most people.
You're the typical pseudo-intellectual who thinks they have all the answers and when you meet someone who doesn't play your game you resort to insults. You take this way too personally which means either you're f@g (which would explain why you felt insulted when I said "aberration") or you have family/friends who are. Either way you're too brainwashed and in love with yourself to accept any kind of logic, which is pretty sad and pathetic.
I don't care what f@gs do behind closed doors, if they kept it to themselves no one would give a sh_t. I never condemned anyone for anything, I just stated facts. If humans stopped procreating humanity would cease to exist. Therefore it logically follows that men and women were not intended to mate with their own sex because it would lead to the end of their species. You then start talking about car salesmen and blacksmiths cause you can't refute that point so you change the argument. And I never brought religion into this, not once, so I'm not sure why you keep bringing it up, thinking I'll be insulted by religious jokes. You don't need religion to understand why it's wrong, common sense will do for most people.
You're the typical pseudo-intellectual who thinks they have all the answers and when you meet someone who doesn't play your game you resort to insults. You take this way too personally which means either you're f@g (which would explain why you felt insulted when I said "aberration") or you have family/friends who are. Either way you're too brainwashed and in love with yourself to accept any kind of logic, which is pretty sad and pathetic.
Comment