Question for the boxing purist!!!
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
I'd say Hopkins because Tito was a better fighter than Chico and Tito let loose the whole kitchen sink in 6 and 10 and couldn't do anything. Mayweather was dazzling but given court issues and weight issues going in, there was at least a slim question of whether he could have done a little better. I think Tito fought as well as he could and still couldn't do anything because Hopkins was having the night of his life.Comment
-
Can you say killer feints!!! B-Hop did what he wanted to do all night long and there was nothing Tito could do about it!!!I'd say Hopkins because Tito was a better fighter than Chico and Tito let loose the whole kitchen sink in 6 and 10 and couldn't do anything. Mayweather was dazzling but given court issues and weight issues going in, there was at least a slim question of whether he could have done a little better. I think Tito fought as well as he could and still couldn't do anything because Hopkins was having the night of his life.Comment
-
Mayweather-Corrales.
Hopkins beating Trinidad was huge, a great win. But Trinidad was best at WW, by far.
Corrales was the man at 130, and many thought Floyd would lose too. And Floyd gave one of the most dominant beatdowns between two Top 10 P4P fighters in recent memory.Comment
Comment