Why didn't Wlad avenge his loss to Sanders?

**Jam Jars** · 10-01-2012, 04:36 PM

He got destroyed there was no need for a rematch.

**yoz** · 10-01-2012, 04:40 PM

Originally posted by Own3d

He got destroyed there was no need for a rematch.

He rematched Brewster; plus Vitali fought Sanders in a one-sided fight.

Did Sanders simply have Wlad's no.?

**Jam Jars** · 10-01-2012, 04:48 PM

Originally posted by yoz

He rematched Brewster; plus Vitali fought Sanders in a one-sided fight.

Did Sanders simply have Wlad's no.?

Honestly i believe that they knew Sanders would always be a risky fight and a rematch wasn't worth the risk. Some of the shots Sanders caught Vitali with in the first couple of rounds would have dropped Wlad again.

**demonlight** · 10-01-2012, 04:52 PM

He did.

He shot him.

Too soon? Sorry, had to.

**Mato o Muero** · 10-01-2012, 04:53 PM

Because he woulda got knocked the fug out again

**The Ban Stick** · 10-01-2012, 05:10 PM

Originally posted by demonlight

He did

He shot him.

Too soon? Sorry, had to.

Sorry, had to ban you. Too soon?

**oscar_angels091** · 10-01-2012, 05:13 PM

Originally posted by demonlight

He did.

He shot him.

Too soon? Sorry, had to.

what a b i t c h

**The Ban Stick** · 10-01-2012, 05:15 PM

Originally posted by yoz

Curious, that's all.

Wondering why you think anyone here would even know that? Why are you asking a bunch of people on a forum who can't answer it?

**ModernTalking** · 10-01-2012, 05:33 PM

Sugar Wald Klitschko want none of Sanders after that beat down.

Why didn't Wlad avenge his loss to Sanders?