Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Explains Why He Passed Over Timothy Bradley

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thedarkness
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Dec 2010
    • 627
    • 77
    • 3
    • 10,233

    #51
    Originally posted by PRBOXINGCOTTO
    Bradley won the fight last time I checked PAC I hope Jmm doesn't get robbed again when he beats you again


    too many contradictions in your post.

    first you say bradley won the fight?

    then you go on to say hope jmm doesn't get robbed again lol.


    typical puerto kneecan puto.

    Comment

    • whitelightning8
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Feb 2011
      • 134
      • 11
      • 4
      • 6,195

      #52
      Originally posted by lebrick


      so bradley goes to the fight injured?
      he was injured "during" the fight, and that is always a possibility since this is boxing. you have to give credit to pac for giving him that injury..
      blind fans always harp that pac can't KO an injured tim, how much more if tim wasn't injured by pac. they would definitely say that tim destroyed pac..

      did anybody watch the postfight interview? tim said he step on the judges foot and later said the refs foot.. LMAO... he was injured because he gets wobbled by a pac shot and his legs buckled.

      i admire tim though for his superb conditioning and will. any 140-147 would go down and call it a day when the going gets tough..
      I'm calling you (the original poster)on your lack of logic. Obviously when he said the judges foot he meant the refs considering the judges aren't in the ring. Pacquiao didnt hurt bradley. Watch his reaction when he actually gets hit, he hardly flinches. All those examples of bradley getting buckled or rocked was him slipping or stumbling on a bad foot. It looked awkward and you saw pac throw 12 pitty patter punches so you assumed pac knocked him off balance. The truth is pac is so fast that making him miss is hard and with a broken foot or even a twisted ankle stepping back or off the line is going to make you stumble.

      Comment

      • Allucard
        Undisputed Champion
        • Jun 2007
        • 5979
        • 393
        • 56
        • 12,399

        #53
        Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
        Manny Pacquiao and Juan Manuel Marquez started their press tour today in Los Angeles at the Beverly Hills Hotel for their fourth fight which will take place December 8th. Both men have battled to three close fights before and hope to finally be able to close the chapter in their rivalry by giving the fans a definitive victory.

        Pacquiao’s choice of opponent came down to Marquez and also a rematch with WBO Welterweight champion Timothy Bradley. Bradley was awarded a controversial victory this past June over Pacquiao in a fight many thought Pacquiao had won.
        [Click Here To Read More]
        I'm not fooled, that's still an L by an younger improving fighter who happened to be injured in the fight. I don't think Pacquiao can win an easy fight vs Bradley. And at this point Bradley would be about as profitable as Marquez.

        Comment

        • FeFist
          No.1
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 9252
          • 576
          • 357
          • 29,695

          #54
          Right, I'm going to go ahead an acknowledge Bradley as the winner of that fight. As far as I'm concerned Pacquiao had the opportunity to right any potential wrong, he chose not to.

          Comment

          • whitelightning8
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Feb 2011
            • 134
            • 11
            • 4
            • 6,195

            #55
            Originally posted by DigitalBeast
            Bradley does. He gave Manny a decent fight while not being even close to 100%. Assuming what I have read is true...
            yes bradley does deserve it and clearly pac likes giving people rematches since this is the 3rd for marquez. I've seen marquez win all three times though two were close. Frankly I'm kind of bored with the match up. Marquez has nothing to prove.

            Comment

            • thedarkness
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Dec 2010
              • 627
              • 77
              • 3
              • 10,233

              #56
              Originally posted by whitelightning8
              yes bradley does deserve it and clearly pac likes giving people rematches since this is the 3rd for marquez. I've seen marquez win all three times though two were close. Frankly I'm kind of bored with the match up. Marquez has nothing to prove.

              you said it yourself--pac is giving jmm another rematch because the fights were CLOSE.

              was bradley-pac fight close? yeah, i thought so. most people know pac clearly won that fight hence no rematch.

              Comment

              • PatStay
                Banned
                • Sep 2012
                • 9
                • 3
                • 0
                • 34

                #57
                Originally posted by thedarkness
                you said it yourself--pac is giving jmm another rematch because the fights were CLOSE.

                was bradley-pac fight close? yeah, i thought so. most people know pac clearly won that fight hence no rematch.
                Pac clearly won in everyones eyes vs. Cotto and he still wanted a re-match...at a catchweight no less.

                Comment

                • thedarkness
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 627
                  • 77
                  • 3
                  • 10,233

                  #58
                  Originally posted by PatStay
                  Pac clearly won in everyones eyes vs. Cotto and he still wanted a re-match...at a catchweight no less.

                  but the 2nd fight didn't happen, so your post is irrelevant.

                  Comment

                  • lebrick
                    2/6 and counting
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 2522
                    • 1,018
                    • 621
                    • 34,154

                    #59
                    Originally posted by whitelightning8
                    I'm calling you (the original poster)on your lack of logic. Obviously when he said the judges foot he meant the refs considering the judges aren't in the ring. Pacquiao didnt hurt bradley. Watch his reaction when he actually gets hit, he hardly flinches. All those examples of bradley getting buckled or rocked was him slipping or stumbling on a bad foot. It looked awkward and you saw pac throw 12 pitty patter punches so you assumed pac knocked him off balance. The truth is pac is so fast that making him miss is hard and with a broken foot or even a twisted ankle stepping back or off the line is going to make you stumble.
                    the point is, did he step on someone else's foot? he injured himself without stepping on someone else's foot. he stumbled on himself as you were saying on your post and manny's power punch have zero credit on it...

                    Comment

                    • Pocket Dogs!
                      You want one?
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 4064
                      • 268
                      • 7
                      • 15,636

                      #60
                      “I have nothing to prove against Bradley. Everyone saw who won the fight. If we fought it again it would be one sided” said Pacquiao to BoxingScene.com.

                      Then why was your first choice Cotto?

                      Idiot.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP