Whenever Naseem Hamed switched-stances...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Box"K"ing
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 638
    • 23
    • 0
    • 8,586

    #1

    Whenever Naseem Hamed switched-stances...

    What kind of abilities did he have in orthodox stance and south paw stance?

    What I mean by that is, did he brawl/infight better as an orthdox or when he fights southpaw does he out-box/counter punch better.

    Also what punches did you have to watch out for in his different stances?

    Heres a fight of naseem:

  • Sharpharp
    Contender
    • Jan 2007
    • 140
    • 23
    • 0
    • 6,611

    #2
    Doesn't matter, the stance he will be best known for his when he got knocked silly by Barerra..

    Naseem was just like Khan, skinny runts with big egos and glass jaws, and picked fighters, when they fought someone of a decent calibre they knocked out silly and made to look completely ****** at the same time...

    Comment

    • Box"K"ing
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 638
      • 23
      • 0
      • 8,586

      #3
      Originally posted by Sharpharp
      Doesn't matter, the stance he will be best known for his when he got knocked silly by Barerra..

      Naseem was just like Khan, skinny runts with big egos and glass jaws, and picked fighters, when they fought someone of a decent calibre they knocked out silly and made to look completely ****** at the same time...

      Naseem hamed and khan are different type of boxers, also naseem never got KOed in his career!

      I like naseem and cant stand khan anymore! When naseem lost to barrera, in his post fight he made ZERO excuses and accepted his loss giving barerra his due.

      When khan loses he will blame anyone and everyone but his god awful footwork and lousy fight IQ!
      Last edited by Box"K"ing; 09-11-2012, 04:28 PM.

      Comment

      • jab2theballs
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jun 2012
        • 400
        • 22
        • 22
        • 6,511

        #4
        I could've sworn he said he lost because of Allah. Sounds like an excuse to me.

        Comment

        • Box"K"ing
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 638
          • 23
          • 0
          • 8,586

          #5
          Originally posted by jab2theballs
          I could've sworn he said he lost because of Allah. Sounds like an excuse to me.
          Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat!!!??


          What the hell Allah has to do with a professional boxing match?




          I will check it out, you maybe right but yeah atleast he wasent blaming people left and right like amir has been doing!

          Comment

          • Juof
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 3590
            • 94
            • 273
            • 10,490

            #6
            Naseem said he accepts the loss from allah But yeah hes nothing like amir

            Comment

            • D4thincarnation
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 16198
              • 533
              • 260
              • 133,240

              #7
              Originally posted by Sharpharp
              Doesn't matter, the stance he will be best known for his when he got knocked silly by Barerra..

              Naseem was just like Khan, skinny runts with big egos and glass jaws, and picked fighters, when they fought someone of a decent calibre they knocked out silly and made to look completely ****** at the same time...
              Worst post of the day, too many things wrong in it to even bother correcting.

              Red K

              Comment

              • cameronpaul
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Jan 2009
                • 324
                • 15
                • 3
                • 6,520

                #8
                i think he looks more natural and better defencivly fighting southpaw, in the orthadox stance he tends to just jab alot. either way i dont like his attitude.

                Comment

                • edgarg
                  Honest BoxingScene posts
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 11045
                  • 547
                  • 54
                  • 39,228

                  #9
                  Hamed has a reasonable claim to being a great fighter, or close to it. With his phenomenal reflexes and massive punch, he would have been trouble for anyone. That is, if he concentrated and trained seriously, something he didn't really do in his last 2-3 years, because he'd lost interest due to his hands more or less crumbling. This used to be a well known fact, but now seems to be forgotten. It was legit.

                  He half trained for 3 weeks for Barrera, and it wasn't a wipe-out by any means, he just wasn't expecting anything from Barrera, and made a big mistake. To me, after a couple of rounds of his usual off-balance antics, he seemed to be resigned to losing his unbeaten record. His next-and last- fight was beating a 30-0 Spanish fighter, just to rfinish up a winner.

                  For almost as long as he fought, he was avoided by those top guys in their primes Paulie Ayala, Johnny Tapia, Erik Morales and the great Juan Manuel Marquez, and was the top fighter at his weight. Don't forget, he was really only a little guy, about 5'3" with short arms.

                  Comment

                  • taansend
                    In denial about UK refs
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 2444
                    • 157
                    • 428
                    • 9,153

                    #10
                    Originally posted by edgarg
                    Hamed has a reasonable claim to being a great fighter, or close to it. With his phenomenal reflexes and massive punch, he would have been trouble for anyone. That is, if he concentrated and trained seriously, something he didn't really do in his last 2-3 years, because he'd lost interest due to his hands more or less crumbling. This used to be a well known fact, but now seems to be forgotten. It was legit.

                    He half trained for 3 weeks for Barrera, and it wasn't a wipe-out by any means, he just wasn't expecting anything from Barrera, and made a big mistake. To me, after a couple of rounds of his usual off-balance antics, he seemed to be resigned to losing his unbeaten record. His next-and last- fight was beating a 30-0 Spanish fighter, just to rfinish up a winner.

                    For almost as long as he fought, he was avoided by those top guys in their primes Paulie Ayala, Johnny Tapia, Erik Morales and the great Juan Manuel Marquez, and was the top fighter at his weight. Don't forget, he was really only a little guy, about 5'3" with short arms.
                    This is a boxing fan. Too many on here just slag boxers off - 99% never having been close to a ring themselves or even gone to a major fight.

                    Naseem wasn't skinny. He was as an amateur (I watched him & he was tiny, fast and not a knockout artist). After he turned pro he was brilliant up until the Robinson fight then he caught the same disease that Mike Tyson had. He forgot about his boxing skills & just focused on the KO. Tyson was a great boxer up til Spinks then he went backwards. Naz did the same.

                    He ****ed his own life/career up with his arrogance.

                    He never realised 50% of his potential.

                    However, I think that no matter how hard he trained - under whatever trainer - he would have 'lost' to Barrera. One of those Ali-Norton/Pac-JMM situations....

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP