Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Chad Dawson Ready: I Won't Be Drained, Dehydrated

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Dyabolic View Post


    So we're talking about personal P4P lists here... Should've clarified this from the beginning and I wouldn't had wasted my time with your hypocrite ass.
    No, what you should have done is not assume like the ****** a$$ you are. Jump to conclusions, claim $h!t you don't know about & still continue spouting nonsense, good job.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
      No, what you should have done is not assume like the ****** a$$ you are. Jump to conclusions, claim $h!t you don't know about & still continue spouting nonsense, good job.
      Doesn't change the fact that you're supporting a dude who is draining his opponent when the fight could've been much more even at 170 or 175. And go as far as calling him #1 P4P. All while bashing others that do the exact same thing. Again, stop being a hyopcrite.


      I'd say you're the perfect fit for #2 no?

      According to your logic it's Ok to drain your opponents therefore Pac SHOULD be the real #1 P4P... Actually, wtf am I saying. What IS your logic? Is it ok to do it or not? Or it's only ok to do it when it fits your convenience?

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Dyabolic View Post
        Doesn't change the fact that you're supporting a dude who is draining his opponent when the fight could've been much more even at 170 or 175. And go as far as calling him #1 P4P. All while bashing others that do the exact same thing. Again, stop being a hyopcrite.


        I'd say you're the perfect fit for #2 no?

        According to your logic it's Ok to drain your opponents therefore Pac SHOULD be the real #1 P4P... Actually, wtf am I saying. What IS your logic? Is it ok to do it or not? Or it's only ok to do it when it fits your convenience?

        Copying & pasting a word that does not apply here doesn't make you any less wrong.

        How did Ward drain Dawson??

        Which top fighter has had a better last 2 years than Ward??

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Dyabolic View Post
          Even a Dawson that hasn't fought at 168 in like 6 years? What if Dawson looks like sht during weigh ins/fight?

          Martinez is fighting the #2/3 (with Sturm's loss he should probably be #2) guy in his division who is basically a cruiserweight... See the difference here? Ward drains Dawson, Martinez fights the much bigger guy and only a 2-1 favorite.
          Exposure has a lot to do with this as well. I personally have Chavez winning via KO by attacking the body all night. I think 4-1 is too wide IMO. 2-1 or 3-1 AT BEST I think would be more accurate.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Dyabolic View Post
            Doesn't change the fact that you're supporting a dude who is draining his opponent when the fight could've been much more even at 170 or 175. And go as far as calling him #1 P4P. All while bashing others that do the exact same thing. Again, stop being a hyopcrite.



            According to your logic it's Ok to drain your opponents therefore Pac SHOULD be the real #1 P4P... Actually, wtf am I saying. What IS your logic? Is it ok to do it or not? Or it's only ok to do it when it fits your convenience?
            Who are you to say that Dawson is going to struggle making 168? Everyone here makes more excuses for guys that they feel have a solid chance of losing. This whole "draining" excuse is starting to run wild with people, and being used as a cop out more times than not when people have no clue from a physical standpoint, just what they suspect.

            Comment


            • #46
              Dawson called out and challenged Ward, don't see how that's weight draining. all these people cry about a pound and watch dawson look ripped as usual at the weigh in today. its going to be a good fight.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by S IP U IR S xII View Post
                Who are you to say that Dawson is going to struggle making 168? Everyone here makes more excuses for guys that they feel have a solid chance of losing. This whole "draining" excuse is starting to run wild with people, and being used as a cop out more times than not when people have no clue from a physical standpoint, just what they suspect.
                You have Ward as #1 P4P and Donaire as #4 so I have no interest in debating with you.
                Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                Copying & pasting a word that does not apply here doesn't make you any less wrong.

                How did Ward drain Dawson??

                Which top fighter has had a better last 2 years than Ward??
                You may not consider yourself a hypocrite but people see your agenda. It's all good tho, sometimes you can't help fanboyism. And I already answered your question. I wasted enough time typing to you -_-.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by THE ИATAS View Post
                  Dawson called out and challenged Ward, don't see how that's weight draining. all these people cry about a pound and watch dawson look ripped as usual at the weigh in today. its going to be a good fight.
                  This. Dawson wanted Ward ot the other way around. Im always against weight draining to. Wrestled in high school so I know factually that a pound or two can make a world of difference in your performance and anybody who has wrestled or boxed knos that. That said he wants the recognition and respect that would come from whipping a p4per like Ward.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Dyabolic View Post
                    You have Ward as #1 P4P and Donaire as #4 so I have no interest in debating with you.

                    You may not consider yourself a hypocrite but people see your agenda. It's all good tho, sometimes you can't help fanboyism. And I already answered your question. I wasted enough time typing to you -_-.
                    You answered my question?? There were 2, you didn't answer any.

                    You call it a fact, claiming Ward drained Dawson. The question is how??

                    You thought that I said Ward is #1 if he beats Dawson, when I never did. The 2nd question was which top fighter has had a better 2 years & all I heard was crickets & fancy pasting's as you beat around the bush while trying to ignore the question. You are right about 1 thing though. I shouldn't be wasting my time debating anyone that says it's a fact that Ward drained Dawson.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
                      This. Dawson wanted Ward ot the other way around. Im always against weight draining to. Wrestled in high school so I know factually that a pound or two can make a world of difference in your performance and anybody who has wrestled or boxed knos that. That said he wants the recognition and respect that would come from whipping a p4per like Ward.
                      According to him ONE pound is nothing... And 168 to 170 (which is what Dawson wanted) is 2 pounds, just saying. When you're body is acclimated to fighting at 175 then you have to drop to 168 where you haven't been in 6 years, you don't think that's gonna take its toll? Especially when you walk around what, almost 200 lbs?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP