Cotto lost to PAC due to weight drain and a lack of a good trainer....

[Reloaded]

cotto lost to pac because he was the inferior fighter , period!

he has a better chance of beating floyd than pacman, due to styles!

f0ck the BULL*****!

Your like the voice in the background , yeah whatever he said lol , thing is kid what you call BS you have NO answer for , truth has no answer , thats why you aint got one !

[Vasyl’s dad]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Milk Money

doesnt matter what anyone else says, show me where I said it as you're responding to MY post and not anyone elses.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

Show me where I said that you said?

We can do this all day, the fact is there is a bit of hypocrisy. Floyd has a 2 lb advantage, it is the biggest sin in boxing. Cotto fights 1 lb less then his last fight, it's no big deal...


*snort

you're including me in "pac tards" so you're saying i said it. however, i only speak for myself. so show and prove if you want to make that claim.

dont be a sissy and try to weasel your way out of it, just show me where i said what you claim and I'll leave this site for good.

you painted yourself into a corner, not me. anyone following the discussion will see that.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[danceswithfire]

Show me where I said that you said?

We can do this all day, the fact is there is a bit of hypocrisy. Floyd has a 2 lb advantage, it is the biggest sin in boxing. Cotto fights 1 lb less then his last fight, it's no big deal...


*snort

actually, floyd had a 4 lb advantage at the weigh in...by fight night he looked HUGE againts marquez..just sayin

[HeroBando]

Show me where I said that you said?

We can do this all day, the fact is there is a bit of hypocrisy. Floyd has a 2 lb advantage, it is the biggest sin in boxing. Cotto fights 1 lb less then his last fight, it's no big deal...


*snort

The obvious difference is that the 1lb was contractual, he didn't ambush his opponent. Not that Floyd needed it, just in bad taste.

[CHOWWOKKA]

you're including me in "pac tards" so you're saying i said it. however, i only speak for myself. so show and prove if you want to make that claim.

dont be a sissy and try to weasel your way out of it, just show me where i said what you claim and I'll leave this site for good.

you painted yourself into a corner, not me. anyone following the discussion will see that.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

I can't, you have nearly 15 thousands posts of garbage. Sifting through that would melt a human brain.

But doesn't change the fact that in the sea of tards(including you) there is hypocrisy, anyone following the discussion will see that as well.

[CHOWWOKKA]

The obvious difference is that the 1lb was contractual, he didn't ambush his opponent. Not that Floyd needed it, just in bad taste.

JUST LIKE HOW PACQUIAO DIDNT NEED TO ASK FOR A CATCHWEIGHT IF COTTO WAS GOING TO COME IN AT 146 ANYWAYYYY



I typed that all in caps to show my frustration but I know it will come out lowercase.

[DAN916]

Cotto losted because he goted puncheded a loted.

This is good..

[CHOWWOKKA]

actually, floyd had a 4 lb advantage at the weigh in...by fight night he looked HUGE againts marquez..just sayin

I know br0 he was like 186 at least.

[danceswithfire]

I know br0 he was like 186 at least.

not that heavy but the size diffrence between them was very evident...you cant deny that even as a floyd fan

[Vasyl’s dad]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Milk Money

you're including me in "pac tards" so you're saying i said it. however, i only speak for myself. so show and prove if you want to make that claim.

dont be a sissy and try to weasel your way out of it, just show me where i said what you claim and I'll leave this site for good.

you painted yourself into a corner, not me. anyone following the discussion will see that.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

I can't, you have nearly 15 thousands posts of garbage. Sifting through that would melt a human brain.

But doesn't change the fact that in the sea of tards(including you) there is hypocrisy, anyone following the discussion will see that as well.

where is the hypocrisy when i clearly stated floyd would beat him at any weight because hes taller, heavier, stronger and faster?

do you even know what the word means?


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android