Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WBO: We have no respect for Bradley.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Emon723 View Post
    Moved on and fight Amir Khan, maybe Bradley can get some respect.
    yea beating Amir Khan is the ticket .... he can be in the same company as Prescott Peterson and Garcia .. that'll def get him a ton of respect

    Comment


    • #32
      its not bradleys fault that the judges messed up

      Comment


      • #33
        if the organizations get a hand in deciding the winner the sport will fall apart and never recover, they have too much power as it is.

        just imagine them starting to do that more often knowing how corrupt they are. the wbo shouldve made pacquiao bradleys mandatory, thats the only fair thing to do. stripping bradley isnt fair and can lead the sport down a dangerous path.

        Comment


        • #34
          Pacquiao won.

          everyone knows

          we will never forget it.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Earl Hickey View Post
            Pacquiao won.

            everyone knows

            we will never forget it.
            Exactly. There are lots of fights throughout history where sh** like this happened, and we don't forget them. Bradley will never get credit for winning, because he didn't.

            Comment


            • #36
              I honestly don't understand what fight some people were watching. I can't remember my scorecard but I think I had a draw.
              Honestly, if you watch the fight and pretend it ain't Pac, you will so a lot of ineffective aggression, 5 - 6 shots thrown, one lands and Bradley counters.
              I think people put too much stock in the fact Bradley has feather punches and think, well if Pac hits Brad 1 for 1, then Pac gets the score because it was the harder punch but I argue, if it takes 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 shots to land one, then the point goes to Bradley.
              Anyway, point being, people who say Pac dominated, seriously watch the fight again. OBJECTIVELY!

              Comment


              • #37
                Hmm, they should of done this for the Marquez fight

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by craigus1990 View Post
                  I honestly don't understand what fight some people were watching. I can't remember my scorecard but I think I had a draw.
                  Honestly, if you watch the fight and pretend it ain't Pac, you will so a lot of ineffective aggression, 5 - 6 shots thrown, one lands and Bradley counters.
                  I think people put too much stock in the fact Bradley has feather punches and think, well if Pac hits Brad 1 for 1, then Pac gets the score because it was the harder punch but I argue, if it takes 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 shots to land one, then the point goes to Bradley.
                  Anyway, point being, people who say Pac dominated, seriously watch the fight again. OBJECTIVELY!
                  I'm a biased Brit

                  anyone on this site will tell you that I hate all fighters who are not British equally (apparently)

                  So i think im in a good position to judge, as I despise them both to the same level.

                  Manny won by at least 4 rounds.

                  The end

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Rip Chudd View Post
                    Hmm, they should of done this for the Marquez fight
                    Originally posted by brickcityboxing View Post
                    Here's an even CRAZIER IDEA !!! Pacquiao rematches Bradley and gets "His" belts back so there is no need for an asterisk ... ... Right ????.....*crickets*
                    Originally posted by craigus1990 View Post
                    I honestly don't understand what fight some people were watching. I can't remember my scorecard but I think I had a draw.
                    Honestly, if you watch the fight and pretend it ain't Pac, you will so a lot of ineffective aggression, 5 - 6 shots thrown, one lands and Bradley counters.
                    I think people put too much stock in the fact Bradley has feather punches and think, well if Pac hits Brad 1 for 1, then Pac gets the score because it was the harder punch but I argue, if it takes 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 shots to land one, then the point goes to Bradley.
                    Anyway, point being, people who say Pac dominated, seriously watch the fight again. OBJECTIVELY!
                    This pretty much sums it up..

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Should Pacquiao have won the fight? Sure, but I don't think it was as dominate for Pac as some people make it seem. And Bradley definitely did nothing wrong. Bad decisions happen, it's human error. You can't blame a fighter that the judges did their job poorly.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP